this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
257 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
6685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

hey, you can't make bot profiles! that's our thing!

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Haven't used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won't be using it in the future. I'm not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If you can limit things to one bot per person, it will solve the problem. One bot per person is equivalent to traditional cat fishing.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess the have to be somewhat unique like a face.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your iris is as unique as a fingerprint.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It's it easy to generate fake fingerprints though?

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 33 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

🤮

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 5 points 3 hours ago

Well that was a quick decision to delete my account

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 3 points 4 hours ago

They give you the poison to sell you the cure.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris's and start generating fake ones?

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Gee I wonder where one might get a database full of iris scans?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

This stuff is gonna fail hard

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

No thanks, I'm out

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 25 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

[–] SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net 20 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago

Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 11 points 6 hours ago

make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Because it's "futuristic" and fascists are obsessed with that image

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

Data to sell

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So what's the dating scene like for bots anyway? What do they do on a first date? Do they show eachother their prompt?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

They are scammers who try to manipulate you into buying worthless crypto, or blackmail you after you send "your girlfriend" intimate pictures or videos.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Next in AI: realistic eyes!

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is this legal in Europe? I doubt that will fly here.

I've not used tinder anyway, I'm more the feeld kinda person but I bet this kind of thing will spread if it's successful.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Why not? What is the difference between that and other proof of authenticity through pictures?

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 59 points 12 hours ago

“Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not a fucking chance.

[–] musket528@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

tinder is 0% of humanity by definition💀

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 87 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 48 points 14 hours ago

Yeah but then they wouldn't get to collect people's biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 25 points 13 hours ago

AI is not doing this all on it's own.

Where there are fake profiles, there are also real human scammers owning them. And they won't have no problem at all with buying enough real human data from somewhere.

So if tinder wanted to do such a thing for serious, they wouldn't choose such a stupid , short-sighted action.

load more comments
view more: next ›