this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
852 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85278 readers
5664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't. I just can't.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (11 children)

If this comes to Canada I'll be driving an electric scooter or bike.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 19 points 1 month ago

This sort of bullshit is why I am happy to ride a bike.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago (14 children)

guess its time to buy the 1995 ford then?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Well now see, now I'm at a cross roads. On the one hand, fuck privacy violations.

On the other hand, fuck drunk drivers.

I guess in the end, my logic is that this will barely be used to detect drunk drivers, and FULLY used to track you in real time.

So lets all fuck over their technology by making nothing but right turns for 8 hours. Just a massive small circle. For 8 hours, every day.

Then it will be assumed their tracking is broken, and they'll waste time figuring out whats broken.

If we all do this, every day, in electric vehicles powered by solar chargers, then we'll save the world!

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Punishing drunk drivers wont solve the problem. So even if that was the case the better option would be to deal with the problem at the source. Which they already would have if they cared enough. Since they havent i think its fair to assume this is not the main objective of this.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

https://futurism.com/the-byte/camera-cars-detects-drinking

A team of Australian scientists have cooked up a new AI-driven camera system that can detect whether you are too drunk to drive a vehicle.

But the project isn’t quite ready for wide use with only 75 percent accuracy, according to the researchers out of Edith Cowan University in Western Australia, who had presented this camera project at a computer vision conference earlier this year.

Should be interesting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I assume the NHTSA will pay for it? Good luck, fuckers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So this works perfectly and has no bugs, right? There's probably going to be millions of false positives everyday and people won't be able to use their cars. Between this and AI age verification and everything else, the dumbass politicians in power seem to think all this shit is magical wizardry. Their going to cause society to collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I worked on this a bit. Some of the tricks they had were changing the AC to blow colder air when drowsiness was detected, increasing the blower speed, increasing brightness on the dashboard, and turning the volume up or turning the radio on. They even had turning the radio on and selecting music to combat drowsiness. So I guess you'd get sleepy and then your car would automatically started blasting house music.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I worked on this a bit

Fuck you, get a different job.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So I'll have reduced millage/charge and extra weight for carrying around this surveillance technology for the government and whose sole benefit will be the government?

Will I be compensated for this burden? No?

Would I be penalized for removing it from my car on my own?

What happens if it "breaks"? Will I be expected to fork over my own money to repair/replace the government's surveilance device? Logically speaking, burdening the car's operating with a regulatory requirement like this could constitute a taking. Then again, it could be a logical extension of Congress's taxing and spending power, but it probably isn't without a strict mandate from Congress to have those devices. Maybe it goes to Congress's powers to regulate interstate commerce.

[–] better_than_god@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Chinese EVs it is, nonIronically safer and more trustworthy than American products

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Drivers in tatters.

I'll just walk outside where there's no surveillance.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagine this is what encourages people to ramp up public transit construction nationwide. Along with the Strait of Hormuz blockade.

Looking forward to all the good that will come from people refusing this stuff

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›