this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
163 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29567 readers
1953 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Labor unions, democratic organizations and community groups are organizing an economic blackout this year to commemorate May Day, International Workers Day, inspired by the economic blackout in Minnesota during the massive ICE operation in the state.

May Day Strong events are being planned across the US, with organizers calling for “no school, no work, no shopping”, in protest of government policies they say put billionaires’ needs above those of workers.

“May Day has to become bigger in this moment,” said Stacy Davis Gates, president of the Chicago Teachers Union and Illinois Federation of Teachers. The unions have backed the economic blackout planned for May Day. “This is about building a more popular united front.”

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Instead of planning a one day of action like this ... just get people to agree to step back from excessive shopping, spending and send their money to non-corporate mega businesses instead. If everyone did this all across the country, it would severely affect the bottom line of major corporations. Nothing makes these monsters listen more than in taking away their money.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Just get people to step back from decades of brainwashing telling them to buy more more more!

Yeah, not that easy

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s that easy; people are taking out ten year loans on cars rather than just buy used just because they want something new. Ticketmaster has been blatantly ripping people off on concert tickets for decades and the way to fix it would be to just stop buying overpriced tickets, but people are still spending what Ticketmaster is asking. There’s no impulse control for luxury items anymore.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It baffles me that in this economy, companies are still making money off luxury items

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

That's the only market they care about anymore, as far as i can tell. Companies would rather try to sell 10 $1,000 items than 100 $100 items. Understandable in certain respects, but the brunt of the equation lands on the less well-heeled consumers...

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

I have stepped back from shopping not out of protest but because shits too expensive. There was a time when I would get $200-300 worth of food from Costco monthly to stock up. I have restortwd to Aldi and only the basics to survive. Bean and rice wraps are my family's main source of food for the last 8 months.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

For real a one day black our literally means nothing. More than half of those people will just buy 2x as much tomorrow, or planned around not buying anything for the one day (read:spent more before or after) which makes the weeks bottom line look no different than it did last week. Quit participating in consumerism as a whole if you want to make a difference! Or strake out for more than a week so it actually hits their pockets. Promise everybody nobody supports a one day strike more than the private corpos knowing you'll be back for more tomorrow after getting the anger out of your system.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes getting people to take the first step helps them get moving in the right direction.

A day of action where people can see many others doing it will cause many people to think about this more.

This is a good idea even if its individual effect will be small, it will help light the fire.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I hope your right! Not saying doing nothing is the answer, just foolish to think a single day strike is going to hurt the big corps pockets. But if it gets people to do more, then that's what really matters.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Exactly one day doesn’t do anything to cause pain but it does send a message and could change culture if it continues and builds more momentum.

The single day isn’t what they need to fear, the culture change is.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

An even better option is to boycott one company or corporation ... just one until you either run them to the ground or eliminate them completely. Keep shopping like you always do, just get everyone to avoid a particular company or corporation.

I'm up here in Canada and during the gas price wars that started in the late 1990s, everyone ranted and raged when the price of gas jumped by half a cent. In those early days, everyone rallied and wanted to do something about it all. One successful campaign was in organizing people to just boycott one of the companies. For instance, just get everyone to avoid Shell for a month, or avoid PetroCan for a month, or avoid Esso for a month. It may or may not have had an effect but one of the things that came out of it was an even bigger media campaign to shut down movements like this. There was a big corporate backlash and you could see trolls and fake accounts appearing everywhere to shut down this movement ... it did shut it down but the takeaway for me was that it meant that it had a strong effect on corporations.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

When they spend money on corporate propaganda, you have their attention and have started making them dig in their own pockets. Need more organizations like this!

[–] Crystalbound@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just being realistic - this will have no effect unless its sustained and massive. Otherwise its just a blip on the radar that companies wont even notice

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

And some people will stock up the day before, completely defeating the purpose

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 hours ago

i am getting increasingly annoyed by "Activists".

Those people are just citizens living their life and making sure their elected government knows what they want it to do and what not.

not fucking "activists". just people. as in "The People" who is the sovereign of any democracy. or Citizens, as we usually call them.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

A sustained rent/mortgage strike would do a lot more damage and help build up the working class's resources, making future economic strikes actually viable.