this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
175 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29567 readers
1953 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That's crazy that even See BS News can't save him.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 hours ago

All media is complicit in sane-washing this fucked up narcissist pedophile. They are all protecting him.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 75 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

After his lawsuits for editing, I feel the best course is to run everything he says without editing.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 40 minutes ago

I feel someone with money should sue 60 minutes for editing. There's precedent for it and all...

[–] homes@piefed.world 31 points 3 hours ago

Then it would be 60 Hours, not 60 Minutes

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

With some sort of chyron streaming across the bottom of numbered generated using the time code as a seed.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago

Let him make himself look like an idiot! FFS. At this point if you're sanitizing it, you're part of the problem

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

"There’s so many things that I’m against. I don’t think they’re controversial. I think the other side is controversial, but I do a lot of things and I get things done.”

The man doesn't understand words.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 minutes ago

Doesn't need to. He loves the poorly-educated.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago

He’s like the futurama 80s business guy

I’m not BLANK, the other side is BLANK.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 hours ago

He doesn't understand not raping kids too.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Crystalbound@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Or percentages. Any normal human behavior, really.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 3 points 1 hour ago

The truth burns him like holy water to a demon.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The NOT INCLUDED parts of the transcript are what got cut.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 minutes ago

Oh man I was unaware of the 60 minutes interview or the unedited cut...and posted a trump-esque rant about the "assassination attempt" earlier this morning that hit on some of the same exact points as his.

That's fucking great.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

He thinks we should be grateful that his ballroom plan wasn't a hotel.

And this has bulletproof glass. This has you know, this is the highest level of security. Also, very importantly, I could have built suites on top. I could have done a lot of things. I said, no, no, we have this has to be pure. This has to be where people stay off property and they go through one very impactful, very strong entrance, one very powerful entrance. There’s no games with this.

And he refers to the ballroom that isn't there in the past tense, already done.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

Wait. So the crazy shit they did show, was just the stuff they kept in?

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 hour ago

no hay remedio

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago

Release the Snyder cut

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 hours ago

If they edited out his rants then they might as well not air the interview because without the rants there's nothing left.