this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
293 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

86320 readers
4115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 140 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Issue 2: employees were able to manually find and view footage from smart glasses

Issue 1: meta exists

At least that’s where I’m at.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 82 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Issue 3: People are stupid enough to wear INTERNET CONNECTED GLASSES while having sex.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Makes you wonder what your phones sees / hears every day.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Probably a lot of post-nut clarity face

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps they didn't wear them, the user thought the glasses were off and not recording.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I mean ... You think all of these people just happened to set their glasses down on a nightstand and just happened to be point at them while going at it?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Most likely the glasses were places on a nightstand or something. They mentioned this in another article. People would place the glasses somewhere thinking they are not recording and undress for example. They would also go into changing rooms while wearing glasses but that's understandable.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I doubt this is always or even often the case, though. Your glasses would have to be somehow pointed directly at you on your bed. Most people would fold them up and set them facing up or in a case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That was my thought. Who the hell wears glasses while they fuck? I mean, did they WANT to record it?

I can't imagine being all nekkid and shit, shaggin someone and wearing those fucking moronic glasses. Those stupid things are a leading cause of vaginal dryness.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

What's more surprising is people are getting laid wearing those big ass dork frames

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

I would assume they were placed on a bedside table pointed in the general direction of the fucking.

But still.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 77 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Meta contractors were tasked with viewing peoples glasses video, where the wearers did not appear to know they were being recorded. "For quality purposes". Including using the bathroom. So everytime a glasses user goes to the bathroom, a kenyan could be watching? Every time they enter their online banking credentials, a kenyan could be noting them down? Good god.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Obviously not. That contractor is blown. On to Myanmar!

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

Oh no, not a kenyan :0

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can we please not use the International Business Times? I promise I'll have a prebaked explanation someday, but until then, here's the Ars Technica article this sewage drain of an outlet is using as its lone source.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Is it just me or is Lemmy being flooded with bottom of the barrel journalism? This is an issue in so many communities that I‘m starting to think it‘s just a few people with multiple accounts pushing an agenda of slop. And people eat it up almost every time.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

pushing an agenda of slop

I tend to assume "don't know better, and moderative action for gatekeeping quality on Lemmy is sparse and delayed". Sometimes we just get Reddit's backwash because that's what's easiest, and Redditors are not discerning either.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They know better because they have been told again and again. But they only keep multiplying by the looks of it. Lack of moderation or direction probably is a huge factor I believe.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 64 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I don’t understand why the outsourcing firm was punished. As far as I can tell, a thousand people are losing their jobs for no reason. This wasn’t their fault, and I don’t see what problem is being solved here. It makes absolutely no sense.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 79 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meta punishing whistleblowers for doing what Meta hired them to do.

“We hired them to watch everything, and are shocked outraged to hear that includes intimate videos of our users.”

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago

Ah. I didn’t realize that Meta considered them “whistleblowers”. It’s still a shitty thing to do, but shitty is what corporations excel at.

[–] courval@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

It's not difficult to understand really. These underpaid slaves failed their task by having morals and complaining too much so they're off to find other slaves that keep quiet..

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

These concerns were first reported in February 2026, when journalists in Sweden and Kenya spoke to Sama employees. Workers said they had seen videos that appeared to show people in private situations, and in some cases, they believed users may not have realised they were being recorded at the time.

Talking to the media is a big problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

destroy the surveillance plague now.

[–] courval@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Take the god damn glasses off!

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Probably intentional, they wanted pov video

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

google glasses 2.0 basically. anything that allows almost private use of the internet in public places without anyone able to see what you are browsing always lead to porn/sexual activities.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 4 points 2 months ago

the private way to use internet is vpns, https, dns over https, decentralized services and not a security camera on your head

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Ban Ray-Bans, maybe. 😏

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

If I'm not casing a casino, I don't need spy glasses.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Came here for this.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Forget Norway!

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Must be durable glasses at least.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would have thought they would have needed something bigger to have sex on

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This one is the joke I was looking for :)

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

How dare someone see sex

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›