No shit? I guess because it’s not coming from us „luddites“ it‘s suddenly worth paying attention to.
this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
660 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
84356 readers
3535 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But how will it effect next quarter?
That generation began as quite conservative. It is going to be real fun watching their brains get scrambled and refried. We have to be ready to catch them when they fall.
AI has many glaring fundamental flaws that there has yet to be any determined solutions to.
New technology isn't adopted when its good and ready to be. Its adopted when the bourgeoisie who have all the money, and no brains, think it's ready to save/make them money.
Don't worry. They'll figure smth out. Probably some kind of pay-to-work scheme, like a reverse internship
As well AI, even by automated agents and the best models so far, cannot reach the ethical and quality match of a human in terms of being limited by the input it receives. Sure it can gather some of the finest research and paths towards solving a problem quickly. However, the value of the input and outputs are predictions that sometimes do not match the quality needed for well-being. Whatever the size of the model and memory available, it is a failure to think that it will keep refining to a point of perfection. It is a matter of some probability, and every case is based on the limits of its inputs. Thereby I treat it as a tool that expands my abilities rather than a business focus to focus on profit and making it an ability that replaces quality. You cannot replace quality for speed of quantity in processing and calculation. For instance, processes in programming schools allow for quality, now being abandoned for automated checks which in themselves are the wrong way to look at things. Someone said you cannot automate quality. Oh how I wish I could find work to make sure development processes are adjusted for AI as a tool, and its automation reaches the needs of people, designers, and engineers rather than the whims of a business role.
AKA "The great corporate filter of the 21st century".