this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
162 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84356 readers
3557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 21 hours ago

Cheap, infinitly reusable, can instantly recharge by pouring fresh solution in. What's the down sides to these batteries?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The giant battery will be fed with excess energy generated by windmills.

Nice.

This makes the life of the battery practically limitless.

Good.

Plus, it's non-flammable, and almost completely recyclable at the end of its service life.

Great.

capacity of 2.1 GWh, which is estimated to be enough to supply 210,000 households with power for an entire day.

Amazing.

Beyond preventing outages, this one will also be tasked with meeting high demand from AI data centers in the area.

Fuck.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see why anyone would build a AI datacenter in this more populated area of the world, with all the regulations and restrictions in emissions.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regulations in Switzerland rarely get in the way of making money. Ever heard of UBS?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But the environment is "Folksseele", important to the people. And it was too hot already in April, the glaciers melt away.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well it looks like the people can get fucked if there’s enough money in it

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"We will be able to inject or absorb up to 1.2 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity in a few milliseconds," FlexBase co-founder Marcel Aumer told Swiss public broadcaster RTS earlier this month.

Does this make sense? How the hell do you transfer that much energy in milliseconds? Especially with a battery that requires the flow of liquid?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

This article is complete bullshit. What they probably meant is that it can switch between energy input and output within milliseconds, which is realistic. Whoever wrote this lacks a basic understanding of the technology.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I read, it does 800 MW max, which is still a lot.

1.2 GWh is just the capacity. And response time can indeed be quite fast as the system is always on standby, but I would guess it would still take a few seconds to go from zero to full power

[–] elmicha@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But with 800 MW it takes an hour and a half to get to 1.2 GWh, and an hour is 3600 seconds or 3600000 ms. So "a few" is doing a lot of work in that quote.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

The quote is obviously incorrect, perhaps the engineer meant to say "absorb 1.2 GWh and start providing power to the grid in a matter of milliseconds", and it was lost in translation.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 day ago

The article was written by someone who doesn't understand the difference between power and energy. It's an extremely common mistake to mix up Watts and Watt-hours, or assume they're the same thing.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If this is some sort of hybrid battery that could be possible... Super capacitors take the initial charge, pass it on to the flow battery. But as far as I know, absorbing or releasing a lot of energy quickly is just not what flow batteries do, it's their biggest limitation.

[–] Ogy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, you COULD just have a massive membrane area. They won't, cause that'd be crazy, but you could.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

True, but that would kind of defeat the purpose of it being a flow battery, I think.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago

It makes a lot of sense as 800MWh available within ms (especially directly linked to a major grid hub like it is the case here, Laufenburg is famous for it as it's also the point where the swiss and German grids meet) is the wet dream of every grid planer that has to stabilize a network. That is around 12% of the whole average power draw of Switzerland. Which is impressive.

We need more of these.

Switzerland and heavy metal bands both agree to 'open up this fucking pit right now'

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Just gotta make sure nobody falls in there.

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

UNLIMITED POWER

[–] winni@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

its a kind of "no proove of concept" as it is build by the guys which heavily lobby mini atomic plants

[–] philpo@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

There are various working redux flow large capacity batteries operating already (as mentioned in the article as well), e.g. Daillan, in Japan, this one is just a tad bit larger