How about vetting Trump before he posts something?
this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
61 points (95.5% liked)
Technology
84356 readers
3535 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why so they can ensure the model lies in their favor?
FIFY White House Considers ~~Vetting~~ taking donations from A.I. ~~Models~~ companies Before They Are Released
Stupid people who can't think will be vetting software that they believe thinks for them. What could possibly go wrong.
The AI also tells them that they're awesome and smart. It's a great match.
AI be like
You’re absolutely right!
It's worse...
I remember something about them preventing states from regulating them too.
They're gonna say only Grok level chatbots are "real" be ause it's constantly tweaked to stay right wing
They know the type of people who us AInare incredibly gullible and prone to being manipulated.
So they're going to force ever American chatbot addict, to use chatbots that only reinforce maga propaganda
This isn't trump making these decisions, they're too logical. It's likely Peter Thiel.
Lol good luck with that. Its too late.
Training costs are still enormous for Generational AI. It’s possible to moderate it by tracking power consumption, data centers, and known actors. Even DeepSeek 4 still cost about $6M to train. If they want to, they can impose regulation while watching for training. Of course won’t matter what China releases
good, I'll add vetted models to my blocklist
"free market"
Don't forget small government.
Of course it is, companies are free to bribe their way out of these rules.
Same capitalist market where billionaires receive massive socialistic handouts, bailouts and tax negations from governments.
this worries me with any tech.
-
if a smaller company dvelopes a competing product (openai and anthropic used to be small) will it hinder them and provide access to only the mion stream companies?
-
how does this affect non-us models?
-
will they only be approved if they say wonderful things about trump? have you ever asked grok about elon?
I really feel like you're actually being too generous to this proposal.
Let's be clear, when this administration says they want to vet new models, what they mean is that they want to turn them into right wing propaganda engines. This is "reprogram ChatGPT to say the 2020 election was stolen, white genocide is real and trans people are all sex predators, or we won't certify it."
This is some Cold War regulatory capture BS based on a Myth(os), something that didn't happen:
Anthropic did in its Mythos system card, suggest a model has “broken containment and sent a message” when it A) was instructed to do so and B) did not actually break out of any container.
I thought it had to exploit zero days to get out to email researchers?
Government finally realizing that bleeding edge software that has no regulation being applied to it needs said regulation after all.
Of course, this is more like the government is making sure the models produce the content the government wants the public to know. Very much like China, Russia, et al. Ergo, controlling the narrative.
or expecting grease on their palms
Start with vetting the big arch and other burgers then let’s talk
He's been vetting them directly for years. Daily vettings, directly into his gullet. What more do you want?
For him to eat as many as it takes to have an immediate fatal heart attack