this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
522 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84434 readers
3926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zuckey78@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Zuckerberg is a parasite. But he’s incentivized to be so by our current US policies.

[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 4 points 17 hours ago

Look at that face. His parents and his bullies failed us all in exactly the same way: he should have been hit more.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they have sufficient evidence, throw the book at him. Commercial copyright infringement is something that comes closest to earn capital punishment in the US.

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

They will settle it for 6.37$

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesnt that make him personal liable since he personally comitted the crimes?

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 2 points 9 hours ago

Crimes only count for poors.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

yes we know we have known this has been known since the start nothing will come of this

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

I am not surprised. They break the law and account for the fines in their business model.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

Not that they would ever get punished, but if they did, it should be based on a percentage of their net worth. None of this "oh, 200 billion annually? Please pay your $100 fine"

[–] sompreno@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep cause copyright infringement is only an issue when its done to them

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Them = publishers? Yes, because publishers and the authors who supply them are the ones owning copyrights. Who else but owners would care about copyrights (literally the rights to copy). It does look to me like AI developers infringed on tons of copyrights but that will be for the court to look at and decide.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Copyright is bullshit, but the only thing worse is assholes like Zuck getting away with what's illegal for everyone else.

And even if the lawsuit wins, you know the fines are a) going to be paltry b) mostly not going to go to those affected... which is everybody, basically.

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Rules for thee..

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Techlords are writing american laws, securing government contracts. Nothing will be done.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Until the working class bands together and brings these fucks down

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

YOU WOULDN'T DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE INTERNET TO TRAIN A WORTHLESS AI BOT

DMCA the whole c suite into bankruptcy and prison

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

don't tell me what i would or wouldn't do, comrade toilet observer. do you have something you'd like to share with the community? did you observe anything of note?

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As i browsed the Internet from my throne of glory, there was the distinct smell of shit

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously? Shit? That's all you have to give us? As a toilet observer I'd expected something more poetic.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Damnit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a linguist

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Laws don't apply to the rich, we all know that, and so does Zuckerbot.

The worst that will happen is a small fine. Small for them, but devastating for anyone not in control of hundreds of billions. "Cost of doing business." And, they'll keep right on doing it.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Zuckerberg seems to be on a losing streak: from the Metaverse tanking, to the Meta Ray-Ban glasses being used to spy on people (and train Ai), and this lawsuit on copyright infringement. When was the last time any of his companies had a win? Every time they seem to steal defeat from any sort of victory.