Can we PLEASE stop supporting these shitty, neo-liberal, billionaire owned media sources?
There are 10k other sources for this article. We don't need to filter our understanding of the world through Jeff Bezo's opinion of how the world should be.
this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
112 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29715 readers
2523 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You could suggest another article link
I claim your source is a liar, and made things up.
So can you. And more importantly, so can op. I didn't post it.
It's easy to fabricate the contents of paywalled media sources as well. If only a handful of people can prove you wrong, your version of the article becomes the truth.
Something I hadn't considered. If we're posting things to comment on and have conversations around, it makes sense to me that any content needs to be open-access to users, otherwise how can we expect to have a conversation?
There are 10k other sources for this article.
So post one.
I looked into this source some more thanks to that archive today link. As I figured, the title is a misrepresentation of the situation.
The actual thing that the article is talking about is the withholding of FEMA funds for certain states (California and Colorado in particular), which just so happen to include fire prevention. The article title would have you believe that the feds are holding back fire prevention funds specifically.
Here are some actual (not paywalled) sources that corroborate my interpretation of OP's source:
My partner plus several of my friends work for FEMA and the sentiment is kind of fatalistic these days. Americans have really fucked these people over. Latest "Fuck you" from not just MAGA was the absolute apathy over the furlough except to get upset when TSA tried to halt the precheck lines.
Before that, DHS started firing people by not renewing their contracts on New years eve, barely a peep on the news or social media.
Also DHS handed down a decree that supervisors are not allowed to give anyone a rating higher than 3 (out of 5) for future annual evaluations. Basically a solid 3 out of 5 is a foundation for firing people.
When there is a major "temporal atmospheric deviation" (they're not allowed to say "climate change") at least we might have the national guard but as for FEMA, it feels effectively dead.