this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
323 points (98.2% liked)

politics

30191 readers
2523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (10 children)

So since those 45,000 aren't going to get representation, surely they won't have to deal with taxation right?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BigBrownDog@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (14 children)

He's absolutely right. It's not a big deal, because no one will do anything about it. Republicans march toward fascism while Democrats wag their finger.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's not nearly enough civil unrest

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The unrest has been very civil up til now.

[–] AlJones@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Civil rights were grasped with the price of blood. "The tree of democracy must occasionally be watered by the blood of tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson.

Exactly I'm with ya, ready with my lighter to burn it down

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I knew Republicans would try and steal this election because that is what Republicans always try to do, but I honestly didn't think they'd be so open and brazen about it

there's no rule of law, American liberals are extremely meek, there's no resistance, no reason for them to even hide it.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There have not been any consequences for well over 30 years. And now the public is glued to their stupid screens and have the mental capacity of a retarded squirrel.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 24 points 1 month ago
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hope it's not a big deal when you suffer in your own hell for being a giant piece of shit, Landry.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

They incidentally would have all likely voted Democrat, but that is not a big deal either...

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

We're fucked.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So...

That was 45k primary ballots, for districts that aren't the same as when they were sent out...

And a new primary with the actual districts will happen in July?

That legitimately isn't a big deal unless I'm missing something here.

And progressive Dems are likely to do better after another two months of shit going to hell anyways.

Like, I hate to say it, but if you read more than just a headline I really don't see how this is a big deal.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd say that this whole thing is a big bullshit deal, because they are fucking around with the election with the intent to give more power to the party that is tearing down America. It all should not be happening.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

And a new primary with the ~~actual~~ gerrymandered districts will happen in July?

FTFY. The gerrymandering is the objectionable part here, and the new primary will produce gerrymandered results that don't reflect the will of the voters.

[–] AlJones@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Im listening to a group of about 200 labor union lawyers at this very moment. Theyre saying its an existential threat to voting rights.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Can we MAKE it a big deal?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Those 45,000 votes didn't go away, they were just spread across reliable Red districts, which dilutes those districts, and makes them vulnerable.

It might not matter in a normal election, but in an election where Trump is deep underwater in even strong Red districts, we might find that they eliminated one district, but ended up putting two or more other districts at risk. In an election where Dems are more motivated than ever, and MAGAs are talking about sitting it out, those new districts might be in for a surprise.

In addition, at least 36 Republican seats are unopposed, and at least some of those will be surprised flips.

Always remember the most basic MAGA Axiom: MAGA is profoundly ignorant, and virtuosically incompetent. They fuck up everything, and they will fuck this up, too.

And then they will blame Biden and Obama, and say the Dems cheated.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That is what happened in 2018, most states were (still are) heavily gerrymandered for Republicans, but they had gotten greedy and left less margin on their districts, and the president's assholeism saw them lose a bunch of those.

Between Epstein, and the betrayal of "america first," with the wars, we could see a repeat of that.

load more comments
view more: next ›