this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
476 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84671 readers
4181 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't there a law in places that cameras have to have recording lights? I know my Wyze has lights. Why does this not apply to Meta glasses?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Is there? Most phones don't have any light when recording.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Waiting for the X.com Glasses that connect up to my neurolink so I can view a constant feed of rightwing propaganda while the neurolink listens to my brains reactions and feeds it back to optimize for the most rage.

[–] chode_tode@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet people purchase them... so stupid.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There was a nurse wearing them inside a hospital. These stupid people are going to lose their jobs, get sued or get decked

[–] Tiral@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, even if they're being legit with them that's WAY to easy to get accused of something.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Glasshole the term needs to make a significant comeback. Normalize shunning, put up signs on bathrooms and anywhere else you can with

"'Smart' glasses forbidden. Fines applicable. Bluetooth detection active." and perhaps "This means you Glasshole ! "

whether such detection is active is moot, make the bastards as nervous as they should be. A (dummy) camera on the outside of the door should complete the illusion. Make them feel like perverts.

Non consensual filming should be unacceptable, but that's a whole other fight.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bluetooth detection active

Yea, I'd love to get a fine for listening to music while I shit.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You can search specifically for smart glasses, e.g. the aptly named Nearby Glasses

Also, you likely can't fine them, but you can make them think about it.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can I call the police on them for taking an active filming device into a public restroom?

Even if it’s not illegal, surely some shit can he stirred. I think twice after having to wait for an officer to show up, being embarrassed, regardless of how the events turn out,

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

conservative will make bathroom bills all about transfolk but give two fucks about the pervert recording in the bathroom.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago

Sounds good. Bonus points for getting it in the media.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bluetooth devices have MAC addresses which can help tell Meta glasses apart from other BT devices.

Apparently in this case it's a bit more complicated and you have to rely on https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/assigned-numbers/ to identify glassholes.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

How much of what they collect goes to ICE? Besides all of it, I mean?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 133 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I want to like smart glasses. And wearable tech in general. Too bad it's all entirely centralized, monetized, and exploited for political gain.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago

When I learnt about the concept I was immediately in. Even just the option to remind me of people's names would be life-changing, not to mention all the other information and reminders and whatnot not only at my fingertips but right into my eyeballs.

And then Google's glasses came out and were a data privacy nightmare and that day I think I lost another bit of my childhood innocence.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love wearables as well and I'm deeply bothered by apple having the best smart watch in terms of sensor quality. Almost all wearables are locked behind one app or an other, the whole scene kind of blows.

[–] rhubarbe@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 22 points 2 days ago (22 children)

I have a Garmin watch and I can't see any benefit for my usage from an Apple watch. Quick reminder that Garmin watches have 10/15 days battery life and decent privacy 😀.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 18 points 2 days ago

Too bad it's all entirely centralized, monetized, and exploited ~~for political gain.~~ as a fascist surveillance method.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Same. I gave up on the tech future a long time ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 39 points 2 days ago

When you see someone with those take out your phone and take a closeup picture of them. See how they like it...

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am distraught to learn that apparently smart glasses are not banned in the EU. Until now I assumed without checking that they obviously would be.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Interestingly in most of the EU, there's is no expectation of privacy in public and you are free to record people without their concent.

Releasing or using those recordings is a completely different thing though.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago

You're free to record a crowd of people in public. Once you're pointing the camera at a person specifically, that's a whole different issue.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 46 points 2 days ago

Dystopian stuff. The public should be protected from this stuff.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago

I want Smarter Glasses. I'm thinking something like the smart glasses, but it only uses it's camera to locate and highlight other camera lenses. It then activates an infrared laser that the wearer can focus on the other lens to discreetly blind it.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I remember back in the early 2000s, when MiniDV cameras got popular.

They were all obviously a camera just based on the look, they had an obvious lens cap, and even a clear record light so that people could see that they were being recorded.

It is insane that we have done away with all of that, and are actively camouflaging cameras in every day items.

Smart glasses should be banned.

[–] pingu@piefed.europe.pub 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What we need is regulation. These companies will not show ethical behaviour on their own.

See e.g. right to repair, USB-C.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regulation with fines exceeding the profits made on the product.

No more static fines, or fines that are anything less than 100% of the profits made on breaching the regulations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Sci-fi mess up not warning how every damn person would be falling over themselves to be mass surveilled and manipulated.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It seems like soon enough people will start recognizing the things, they're pretty distinctive with the two little circles and heavy frames. I know I would spot them if they were right in front of me.

So, how to NOT look like a perv, if you need to wear glasses, like I do? Wear thin frames, which is what I do now.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 24 points 2 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] core@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In the US, you also have no expectation of privacy when out in public.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean the people wearing nazi glasses are any less deserving of being punched in the face

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

🤓: you can't hit me I've got glasses on

😏: that is why I'm hitting you

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

disagree. I have an expectation of not having my dick being recorded when I'm pissing in a urinal in a public washroom

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

I'm sure the people who have them love harvesting data for AI training since that's what they are clearly for.

[–] Cornballer@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Apparently they are amazing aides for the visually impaired.

full thread

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Accessibility aides are always exempt, obviously. That's not what companies make them for though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›