this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
170 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

60967 readers
890 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Per the github page "With the API stabilized, we aim to have AliasVault undergo a thorough security audit this stage. We have already initiated conversations with renowned cyber security companies who have taken interest in taking this on."

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hope it doesn't say as I didn't bother to check - how do free projects get money for audits like this?

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Good question. I don't see anything about current funding. They do mention in the road map having a premium cloud subscription to cover cloud hosting.

I'm a keepass user myself. Too many hosted programs turn to crap one way or another. Let alone the trust componet. I hope for the best with this software.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Excellent question, because financial transparency is becoming more and more of a factor in my shift to open software.

And I suspect that there are indeed a few not-so-good actors who are abusing FOSS for political or financial gain.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Has this been audited? It’s easy to claim that something is secure, but there have been products that made such claims and were trivially exploitable.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Github page says they are aiming to get one done soon.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 16 points 2 months ago

They shouldn't claim that an effing password manager is "secure" until after they've done an audit.

I'll pass, thanks.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 41 points 2 months ago (3 children)

One thing that jumps out at me reading the readme is the fact that it has a built in email server. Email is hard to get right, and I'm surprised a relatively young(?) project is working on getting all the moving pieces together rather than declaring it out of scope.

It'll be interesting to see how it develops.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

I would never trust a newly written email server and there is absolutely no reason not to use an already existing as a dependency to this project.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm no expert but as i understood, it's the sending part that's tricky to get right. Lots of handshake to handle, all to probably end up in a spam folder or blocked along the way. But receiving from a publicly acknowledged address ? I think it's fairly simple

[–] cron@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

Even then, there are lots of edge cases with e-mail that are easy to get wrong and might become security risks.

I‘m not saying this applies to this project, this is more of a general concern.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Do You know more about the email server part? I understand +addressing but this seems to be more? Do You hand a domain over and it is actually a full MX or is it just an imap client?

[–] hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll optimistically sit back and see what comes of this. I'm happy with vaultwarden.

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They said VaultWarden, not BitWarden. This shouldn't affect them.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

It could. The removal of "transparency" indicates to me that the clients might also stop being open source at some point and Vaultwarden doesn't have its own clients.

[–] Courantdair@jlai.lu 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Looks promising! And it's refreshing to see something that doesn't look vibecoded in a week. Couldn't find any AGENTS.md or other AI crap so I could actually try it

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

They spelled "agents" backwards to throw you off! lol jk

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 7 points 2 months ago

Looks like an interesting project, but I just don't understand it's use case.

I use Keepass and I just copy the (different) email address I used to register for a site into the username field and I'm done.

No hosting required, no additional email server, etc. just credentials in a fully portable file.

Is this trying to automate email based 2FA ?

[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Thanks but i stick to keepass. It does the job

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Yes! Finally one with email aliases.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I actually happened to use AliasVault. It's Free Software from the Netherlands for those who are unaware.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

been the number 2 recommendation after shitass proton on alternativeto.net. ui is a bit weird, but works. password generstion def needs more options tho, some sites need more number or more special characters.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

It worked right out of the box.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Do you have thoughts on 1password?

[–] OpenAltFinder@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I recently started migrating away from 1Password. I was on the individual plan for almost 5 years, but this year they would raise the price. I would happily keep paying, but I just find that the quality has just gone downhill. The Firefox extension seems to freeze up quite often, or unlocking doesn't work, or sometimes it takes 10 seconds +...

The browser extension was also feeling a bit intrusive. It would often pop up for non-login fields. There's also no way to disable it for specific sites.

All in all, I just grew frustrated with it, and decided to switch to Bitwarden. I'm just on the free one, so I am missing quite a bit of functionality.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

I don't know why people use these services that charge you. Just use Keepass. It's free and open source. The only disadvantage is syncthing across devices, but syncthing makes that trivial.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

we used to use it at work. i hated it, cause it did not recognise any non english european character during search. i wonder what happens if someone with a full cyrillic alphabet starts to use a mess like this.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m curious why you asked this?…

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aren't both of them password managers? I guess I wonder if someone has a preference for one over the other.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

They are, it’s just odd to bring up an unrelated software.

I do use 1Password and like it, but I couldn’t compare it to this one.