this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
1132 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

12225 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screencap)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 142 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Mamdani making T. Swizzle pay NYC taxes was the reason he balanced the budget? I thought it's because he negotiated with NY state for aid (which, fair game; NYC pays more in taxes than it gets back), delayed the city pension, and is finalizing a pied-à-terre tax.

What meaningful raise on Taylor Swift's taxes has Zohran Mamdani imposed? Did she not pay taxes before? What's the source here?

The real world is allowed to be complicated and messy, and ironically, reducing it to "hurr durr he taxed Taylor Swift" is doing a disservice to what Mamdani actually managed to work out to balance the budget – which is imperfect, but he inherited a $12 billion deficit from a grifter. It's good for what it is.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 67 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Taylor Swift owns multiple secondary properties in New York City.

She has amassed a massive real estate footprint on a single block in Tribeca, worth an estimated $50+ million. Her holdings include:

  • ​An 8,000-square-foot duplex penthouse at 155 Franklin Street.
  • ​A second-floor unit in the same building purchased for nearly $10 million.
  • ​An $18 million townhouse right next door at 153 Franklin Street.

Governor Hochul and Mayor Mamdani finalized a deal to implement a pied-à-terre tax surcharge on luxury secondary residences in NYC.

The tax starts as a 4% surcharge on the property's value and then there is an annual charge that scales up progressively based on the assessed value.

Rhode Island passed a similar luxury second-home tax targeting non-resident estates over $1 million, a piece of legislation that the press nicknamed the "Taylor Swift Tax" due to its impact on her $17 million Watch Hill mansion.

To say that this alone is balancing the budget is an oversimplification (what are hot takes if not reductive) but the tax will have a meaningful impact because she owns a lot of property in NYC.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The tax in its entirety is supposed to bring around 500 million. The NYC budget was 12 billion in the red.

It's a great start, but suggesting that they managed to balance out the budget thanks to something that handled 1/24th of that deficit is just silly.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Sure, it is reductive but I also get what the image is referring to and don't think we have to be too literal about it. It's saying the spirit of that tax (ie. taxing the ultra wealthy) is how Mamdani is going about balancing the budget - while invoking a very recognizable billionaire to drive the point home. I read it more as using Taylor Swift as an example rather than insinuating her taxes, or the secondary estate tax in general, would be enough to balance the budget on their own.

Many hot takes are like this. They're meant to capture your attention, and while they may not be literally true on their own, the good ones have a reasonable conceptual foundation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Enough partial solutions will sum up to a whole. If we treat them all as insignificant, then none will be enacted and no progress will be made.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 79 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The good thing is that she still can donate to food pantries too!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

taylor parties with magats i woulndt be so sure, and shes conservative herself.

[–] telllos@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Giving the freedom to billionaires to not pay taxes because they donate to charity is so very wrong.

I don't have the power to decide where my taxes go. They shouldn't either.

"Who knew non-profit would be so profitable?!"

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As much as it would hurt charities, removing the tax deduction for donations of any kind feels necessary at this point.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Turns out, lots of charities are also grifts for their administrators.

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well, they're actually not paying taxes on that portion. So they're effectively getting to use your taxes to to multiply their promotion of whatever the goverment defines as charitable, be it food pantries or religious communities "providing" conversion therapy.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Sam Altman knew.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Abso-fucking-lutely.

Every billionaire is complicit, including your favorite billionaire: The pop star, the superstar athlete, the philanthropist, or the guru who cosplays as middle class. They're all motherfuckers.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is why I can't stand to watch professional sports anymore, just some millionaire getting payed by his billionaire owner to play a game so you stay distracted by your bread and circuses.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whatever you do, never mention this world-view at work, if you value your career.

I just hoot and holler along.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Totally honestly, I'm pretty open about all my views no matter where I am.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why are all the memes now text on top of pictures of randos

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mamdani made Taylor Swift pay taxes

False: there's no mention of Taylor Swift in particular. This may be an attempt to create a false conflict between the two.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

It's always weird cuz I donate to Charities and I also already pay taxes. How come they can't do both?

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just looking for a reason to bring the plane memes back

[–] gary215@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I knew it was Taylor Swift's fault the whole time. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago (14 children)

He balanced the budget by doing some things right! But an additional 4bn came from the Governor that is trying to get reelected and is sucking up. Don't forget that.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I thought he didn’t adjust taxes? I thought pension funds were used.

I’m not 100% up to date though so i may just be wrong.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He suspended pensions contributions, took just over $8bn in state aid funding and exemptions from state regulations, and delayed initiatives such as classroom size reduction. The city also over-estimated the number of employees it would have this year so that was an extra special saving of $1.3bn when expected outgoings were reconciled with the actual number. The actual tax increases he has implemented would “only” be worth $500m.

Basically it was a one-time thing, and the budget won’t be balanced next year, and the tax increases are nowhere near enough. But it got good press for a couple of days which I suspect was the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whambawhomp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

It's both. He convinced Kathy Hochul to pass a tax on second properties (pied-à-terre tax), but he also suspended pension contributions for 5 years.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Did he figure out a way to tax the billionaires that primarily own assets?

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Yea i looked it up earlier. It looks like a tax on second homes valued over a certain amount

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Fuck yeah he did.

And, shockingly, they're not leaving NYC en masse.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

We desperately need a tax on securities. I don't particularly care about taxing luxury products, because those products are produced by workers, who pay taxes and buy things. But securities are the "means of production".

Don't tax the dollar value of the security. Don't force them to liquidate their shares before they can pay a tax. Just go ahead and transfer a percentage of their shares of each security to the IRS, who can liquidate it on the open market, slowly over time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That and a fucked up minimum wage

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I am not sure if you are familiar with NY's minimum wage. NY is one of the states that set the state minimum higher than the federal minimum and continued to do so. It still isn't enough, but we are trying here.

https://dol.ny.gov/minimum-wage

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago

Aaaah she’ll shake it off.

(Which is a mandamitory remark at this point)

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What you have to understand is that Taylor Swift paid a very tiny portion of her net worth in taxes. And she probably spends more flying around on her jet then she does in paying taxes.

Rich people don't pay taxes as a sport not to save money. They just want to be part of that club.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

To be fair, NYC has always had a balanced budget. It's literally required by law.

Though there's definitely been an increase of social services which is good.

Though I think it's a misrepresentation to say that money came from taxing rich people more. The bulk of it, if I'm not much mistaken, has been from some creative accounting with the NYC pension system.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This is true, but also Adams left a huge deficit on his way out with must-pays with the sole intention of hurting Mamdani utilizing that requirement as a cudgel. It's nothing short of impressive that he was able to stick to his values and reverse the damage at the same time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›