this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
36 points (92.9% liked)

Canada

10494 readers
663 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

Only $200 million? That’s like 100 treatments in the US per year for all of Canada?

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly, this is reasonable. $200M is basically loose change in the couch as far as national budgets are concerned.

If we don't have the technology or the expertise to perform the procedure here, I have no problems as a taxpayer paying about $10/year to let people get those procedures done elsewhere.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

we don’t have the technology or the expertise to perform the procedure here

I would say this is the part that's unreasonable. Being the only G7 country unable to perform proton beam treatments isn't exactly a point of pride.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

Being the only G7 country unable to perform proton beam treatments isn't exactly a point of pride.

There is something to be said about self reliance and independence, but I don't have the data to know if that's actually a problem. Until I have that, I'll give the government the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the cost/difficulty of comprehensive healthcare.

For example:

  • Would it cost more than $200M to spin up a program like that?

  • How long would it take to train enough prople and acquire the equipment to make the program worth it?

  • How many years would it take before we started to see a return on that investment?

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Also the only g7 without high speed rail!!! Wooooo!!

canada #7!!

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

From the data listed the chart I'm surprised adding more MRI's isn't low hanging fruit. As expensive as they are should be able to recupe their cost fairly quickly. In context it's relatively straightforward monetary investment that would essentially eliminate the need to at the very least send people out of country.