Penelope, you are buying underwear with bows. There are plenty without. I assume this is your underwear fashion choice.
me_irl
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
I want mens underwear with these little bows. I want to feel pretty too but my junk needs room
For the second comment, if the bow is there to please men and infantilize women, why don't you just buy a pair that doesn't have the bow? I'm all for calling out sexism and over sexualization, but i think this is just a case of capitalism being capitalism. Panties with bows probably just sell better to a significant demographic of women.
Your only mistake is taking that ragebait comment seriously in the first place. Bows have nothing to do with children. They are used all over the place as a decorative element.
To help tell the front from the back in the dark.

It's the tiny handle on the syrup bottle
Is it still skuomorphism if nobody knows what it's for or what it represents?
Personally, I wouldn't buy that maple syrup -- not because of the presence / absence of the handle, but because it's a screw-on top. I get Maple Syrup with a flip-top closure, so that dried syrup doesn't interfere with opening and closing the bottle.
How do bows infantilize people?
Because that person thinks bows are childish? Or something?
It's called a skeuomorph, a vestigial design element that used to be functional but has evolved to be purely decorative. It's why maple syrup still comes in bottles with those weird little round handles.
So it's a vestigial bow?
This is something called skeuomorphism. Products that have ornamental design cues from structures that were necessary in it's original design. They employ elements that, while essential to the original object, serve no pragmatic purpose in the new system, except for identification. The bow serves no practical or structural purpose but it's kept there to hark back to the old product before elastic became common.
I like the bow because it helps me identify the front when dressing in the dark.
I always just assumed it was to quickly identify which way is front Yes theres a stamp to represent the back, but a bow is even quicker to identify. I also figured it was decorative as well.
As for me, im sorry but yes i have always found it as a turn on. No idea why, just who I am and what I like.
Looking broadly at clothes from around the world, there does seem to be a tendency for masculine clothes to be minimalistic, using straight lines and minimal decorative flair, and feminine clothes to have more decorative elements ranging from simple pleating to expansive ruffles and lace, more visible patterns, and more curves, whether as part of the garment or as part of the body shown through the garment.
Men's clothes used to be fancier, especially in Europe, until Beau Brummell started a minimalist trend. We still base men's suits on the basic outfit he wore, including the colors.
Look how minimal this looks
