this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
836 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29872 readers
1431 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, Clarence Thomas has been showered with gifts. Flights on a billionaire’s private jet, lavish vacations cruising on his superyacht, summer stays at his Adirondacks compound, tuition for a child Thomas was raising, a quarter-million-dollar motorhome a wealthy friend paid for.

Those gifts were income, and income belongs on a tax return. Thomas treated them as nothing, and no public record shows he ever reported a dollar of it. Under Virginia law, leaving income that size off a return, if it was done to cheat the state, is a felony. The evidence is already public, and he could be charged on Monday.

Virginia law makes it a felony to file a state income tax return with a false statement on it, made with intent to defraud the Commonwealth. The statute is Virginia Code section 58.1-348, it carries up to five years in prison per count, and the clock has not run out on the returns Thomas filed for tax years 2020 through 2024. That is the whole case, and unlike everything else, it is a case a county prosecutor in Virginia has the plain authority to bring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I have been hearing about this guys corruption and scandals since the early 90s.

Hes living proof of why lifetime Supreme Court appointments should not exist

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

BS.

  • Monday is a holiday
  • everything said here has been true for years. Where are the charges?

I understand the desire for justice, I agree this case is egregious, and the proof does seem out in the open, but wishing doesn’t make it so

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The governor is too centrist for this to be a real thing. I'm not holding my breath.

......unless the AG is angry enough about her recent vetoes to say fuck you, I won't do what you tell me.

[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the US - I think we all know the answer.

That country needs to (for so many reasons) drop "In God We Trust" as an official motto - "Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda" seems more apposite.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine, but do it in Latin... for the mystique...

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

𝓟𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶, 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓶, 𝓓𝓮𝓱𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓶

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Possem, Audem, Dehibem

Your phrase is actually a mix of Latin and Portuguese, translating to "I can, praise to God, I got along well."

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus Christ.

There's a difference between possible and probable. This headline is extremely misleading. It might as well say Clarence Thomas could have monkeys fly out of his butt on Monday.

Is it possible? Yes.

Is it probable? No.

I understand this is "a call to action" but the headline is disingenuous.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

I've got to say it. This is a case the Biden DOJ could have brought too. And Obama. The Democrats have got to stop playing games. They should have immediately changed it up when Obama was denied justice picks.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That asshole really needs to fall for all the corruption he has been part of.
But it's doubtful it will ever happen.
Americans simply don't do enough against corruption, no matter how bad and no matter how obvious.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 30 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Nothing will come of it but it at least sounds funny.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 17 points 1 day ago

Isn't Monday a Federal Holiday? The courts will be closed.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 225 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 72 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Yeah that's what I told everyone when Trump was convicted of 34 felony charges :(

If it comes down to it, Trump will just pardon him as "a victim of the radical left".

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this looks like a state charge. trump (theoretically) has no control over state pardons.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Yes but there won’t be any charges. This article is only saying that the state could charge him, if it decided to.

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The good news it's the state of Virginia, not the federal government, that could file these charges, so the president would have no ability to pardon it. The bad news is that it's purely hypothetical. We can all see the crime was committed, but that doesn't mean a Virginia prosecutor will actually go through with pursuing the case on any particular day.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Watch thomas sue, let it get all the way to the SCROTUS and Thomas doesn't recuse himself.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Well, that would be another way to reinforce to American public that SCOUTS is illegitimate.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Would be charged, if the US wasn't deeply infiltrated by Nazis.

[–] magi093@l.tta.wtf 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

To be clear (because it isn't totally obvious from the title and text submitted on Lemmy), this article is a call to action, not reporting on a filing that's actually happened or rumored to be in progress or anything like that:

So why Monday? Because there is nothing special about Monday. It is the next day the courthouse opens, the next day a prosecutor could walk this to a grand jury, the same as they could have on any working day for the last several years. For anyone else, this case would already be filed.

[...]

Three officials can move on this, and they can each do something different, so we ask each one for what they actually have the power to do. [...] Here is where to reach them, by phone or by email.

He could be charged Monday. Or Tuesday. Or he could've been charged last Monday. There's three people in Virginia who have the power to make that happen, you should go call and email them.

Surely it's better to wait until trump is no longer president, otherwise if this forces Thomas to resign trump gets yet another supreme court pick who will be as young as possible to guarantee the court doesn't swing back around for another 40 years

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Virginia's CIA puppet governor won't let it happen.

[–] pootzapie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, let’s prosecute crimes and all but the timing of this kind of seems like we’re giving the pedos another lifetime appointment.. dammed either way. Special shout out to disposing of the useful black idiot first

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (10 children)

how is this guy still employed? honest question - dude has litany of corruption accusations going back decades and he's still holding a position? How does that work?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

and there is no law for the rich

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The legal system exists to serve these people and attack everybody else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You obviously don't remember the nomination hearings regarding the coke can. Should have never gotten the job

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago
[–] bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m looking forward to the Supreme Court ruling that a sitting Supreme Court member has “operational immunity” and effectively ruling that anyone on the Supreme Court can break the law as much as they want until their fucking life ~~sentence~~ term is up

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

And also all supreme court members can't be tax audited. And the creation of a Supreme Slush Fund

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The worst part of this is that even if he is convicted and removed from the judiciary, Trump gets to pick his replacement, so it will not only not fix anything but will very likely make it worse.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The least reliable members of the facist block of SCOTUS are those appointed by Mr. Trump.

He's really, really bad at the job.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean the trial will take time and if Democrats get to control Congress after midterms they could just not confirm any of Trump's picks. Who am I joking, the Democrats would never.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely nothing will happen.

Best case scenario, the stress pushes a clot into his brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xSikes@feddit.online 29 points 2 days ago

Throw all the books at him

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

Oh no how unfortunate.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 21 points 2 days ago

And this is why we are all poor, this is why billionaires keep stealing from us, because of greedy no backbone failures like him.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

him and his wife are both hardcore magats, so crucify them

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

He will not be

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No, he won't.

Should he? Yes, he should have been dragged out behind the courthouse 20 years. But he's not going to ever face any consequences for betraying this country or for taking bribes, even though he's made a career out of doing both.

load more comments
view more: next ›