this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
445 points (96.6% liked)

politics

29941 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive article https://archive.is/hXQTC

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homes@piefed.world 132 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This lady got me drunk on margaritas in between classes when I was a student at Parsons. We talked about Bernie Sanders and politics and she was cool as hell.

I will definitely vote for her if she runs for president.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

I'd rather vote for 2018 AOC personally

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish I drank those margaritas that AOC cooked up

[–] homes@piefed.world 22 points 1 week ago

It was, like, a year or two later when she ran for office, and I was like… I know her… But then it took me a little while to put two and two together and remember where I knew her from. It blew my goddamn mind, lol.

Unfortunately, I didn’t live in her constituency, so I couldn’t vote for her at the time. But I did live in Hakeem Jeffries constituency, so I voted for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Just wait until the DNC tanks her like they did Bernie.

[–] LumberjackRanger@leminal.space 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Greatest fuck up by the DNC in my lifetime

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I blame Hillary and DWS for Trump getting elected in 2016. Trump didn't win...Hillary lost.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (33 children)

Sadly, I feel there are still too many bigots and sexists in the US who cannot bring themselves to vote for a woman, esp. one who isn't 'white enough'. That, piled on top of the 'establishment' Dem factions that will do everything possible to subvert a campaign... which will let the right-wingers/fascists drive right up the middle again.

Feel free to prove me wrong, USA. Please.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 69 points 1 week ago (35 children)

Copy paste from elsewhere in the thread.

You seem well-meaning, but the racism/sexism card is way overplayed at this point in the game. The two examples DNC sympathisers point to for why an AOC run is a bad idea both lost not because they were women, but because they were utterly terrible politicians. I wasn't around for Hillary so I can't go into too much detail, but Harris specifically did her utmost best to destroy every single ounce of goodwill she had. And as for the racism, well, America did overwhelmingly elect Obama in 2008. Even on the far right you see MAGA elect women and minority politicians they agree with (see: MTG), so there's no way the everyone left of Reagan coalition wouldn't be able to elect AOC due to sexism. It's just a complete and utter non-issue.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

When the DNC runs candidates who's campaign promises are status quo, corporate subsidies and serving Israel then yeah, the bigot and sexist vote becomes significant. People need to stop using that as a condemnation of the country as a whole. It's a condemnation of the two party system, a corrupt or derelict Democratic party or a "democracy" which is no longer functioning.

Meanwhile candidates who actually prioritize American voters can win without the help of bigots. Obama proved this back in 2008 and Zohran has proved things have only gotten better. Not only did he win without the bigot vote but without all the other piece of shit voters who showed up for Cuomo in the general election.

Harris was a garbage candidate. Biden was a garbage candidate. Hillary Clinton was a garbage candidate. American voters as a whole are not responsible for the abhorrent behavior by the DNC and assholes who vote for people like Biden and Cuomo in Democratic primaries.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I WAS going to Vote for AOC because she Represents America instead of Israel until all I saw Day Old Accounts telling me Newsom was Better! NEXT time AOC NEXT Time!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

She’s the only federal level Democrat with any sort of broad public support.

No one else is note worthy or generally liked.

She is literally the only option. Anyone else is risking mass voter apathy and a voter turn out flop in an election that should be a slam dunk.

If you’re going to vote in the dem primaries, don’t fucking vote based on who “is most electable”, vote for who you want to win. Choosing the candidate that “is the most electable” keeps losing elections, because that crown keeps getting chosen by corporate owned media who just anoint that tittle to the most corporate friendly candidate, and voters don’t like corporate friendly candidates.

The most electable candidate is one who excites people, no one else even considered for running excites anyone except for corporate lobbyists.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Totally agree.

That said, vote in the general no matter what. If you find voting for a milquetoast Dem unpalatable, which is totally reasonable, consider vote swapping with someone in a safe blue state.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] VoidMentat@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I would vote for AOC in a heartbeat. I am tired of old men ruining the country, and tired of Israel making us their errand boy.

As far as "experience", when did that really matter? Obama didn't have much foreign policy experience either and he was 1000x better than this current troglodyte pedophile.

To me the whole foreign policy angle is a non-sequitur. Unless an candidate has been a senator/congressman for several terms, it doesn't really apply. And how many presidents were that? Some of the best presidents had zilch in foreign policy experience and weren't an elected official for much before they became president.

Obama (one half-finished term as senator). Clinton (Arkansas AG and gov...hardly a place that had any need of foreign policy). Bush Jr (gov of Texas). Reagan (gov of Cali).

Not to imply all were great, but they definitely had, at least from our current perspective, a rational viewpoint where they thought from their POV that they were doing the right thing for the country, instead of this chaotic, narcissistic, demagogue, corrupt stupidity.

At this point a gerbil with schizophrenia would be a better option than Trump.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is young and lacks experience, especially in foreign policy. But that may be exactly the kind of person we need as president: someone relatively untainted by both the DNC and the GOP, and someone who has not spent decades being shaped by corporate lobbying and the protection of profit margins.

We need leadership that is still capable of idealism, somebody willing to push for the kind of social programs this country increasingly needs if we want to reverse the direction things are heading right now.

AOC absolutely could be elected. A 2028 presidential run is not some impossible fantasy. The deciding factor is simple: younger voters would actually need to show up and vote in meaningful numbers.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

lacks experience, especially in foreign policy

I honestly don't think there's a single real person that cares about this in the slightest. The only people I see unironically bringing up this argument are old people who preffer fascists over anyone younger than them.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

O... kay...

So there are other countries on this planet aside from America. In fact, there’s an entire department of the U.S. government, headed by the person fourth in line for the presidency, whose sole purpose is handling foreign policy and relations with other nations.

Foreign policy is arguably the single most important qualification a president can have.

I’m 40 years old, and I’ve been saying this since I was a teenager because I’m not short-sighted enough to think the world ends at America’s borders.

And moreover, I literally said in my original comment that we may need somebody inexperienced like AOC at this point. Did you somehow miss that part?

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not American and my comment wasn't meant to be negative towards you. This is an argument quite often brought up in my home country, usually by the group of people I mentioned. This is also because, similarly to the USA, pretty much all of the 'experienced' politicians are just horrible.

So all I was saying is that, in my opinion, when you take all of this into account, this qualification becomes worthless. Because you can either have a qualified fascist or an unqualified maybe-somewhat-good guy or gal.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Right okay.

I hear what you're saying.

And I'm still saying that it's probably the most important qualification the president can have.

I guess I'm just not connecting what I'm saying in correlation to what you're saying... 🤷

[–] pbjelly@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Young? I’d take young over dementia riddled. Besides, this country desperately needs fresh leadership and engagement from people who are younger.

If Emanuel Macron became French President at 39, I’m sure there’s no issue with AOC being 38 by 2028.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

America isn't ready for competent leadership

load more comments
view more: next ›