this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
240 points (94.8% liked)

politics

29932 readers
2421 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Yeah, tell me all about how the guy who wants to destroy MAGA and fight for health care, is worse than the corrupt, treasonous, racist, pedophiles we have now. At least this one has a D next to his name, and adds to a Democratic majority in the Senate. I'm tired of being lied to by Susan Collins and her ilk.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You’d think Platner was Trump himself, from all these supposed “leftists” in the thread. They are the reason the party can’t move left. They all sit home on Election Day waiting for Jesus himself to be on the ballot.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, I get the point you're trying to make, but I can't begrudge anyone for being skeptical of the guy who got a Nazi SS Tattoo.

Maybe pick a different example next time?

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How about when Kamala Harris ran and instead of voting for her, a bunch of leftists sat home and let Donald Trump win instead to teach her a lesson. I don’t really see a difference here. Leftists demand moral purity and then end up with an actual Nazi instead being elected.

In that case, it was because Kamala walked the line on Israel. In this case, Platner has actually taken the side you want on Israel and you STILL find a gripe about the Democrat to let MAGA win the election over.

Also, you need to understand that people are capable of making mistakes and growing from them. Did it not occur to you that Platner likely did not even know the context of the tattoo when he got it? It was just a bunch of marines bonding and doing a group thing. He went along with it and probably didn’t understand the historical context. I’m willing to bet 99% of the people complaining about his tattoo would not have understood the historical context if they saw the tattoo two years ago. But, now that the DNC did opposition research you’re all suddenly in the know. Well, the opposition research had its chance to dissuade voters in the primary and it failed. Making one mistake in your life doesn’t disqualify you from ever participating in anything ever again. Get the fuck over it. At this point, the primary is over and you have two candidates to choose from.

You people have no plan. Your solution is what? Don’t vote or vote for Susan Collins? Either way, you’re supporting the Republicans and therefore supporting Trump. You are therefore my enemy.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Leftists demand moral purity and then end up with an actual Nazi instead being elected.

You're voting for the guy who had an SS tattoo. Pot, meet Kettle.

How about when Kamala Harris ran and instead of voting for her, a bunch of leftists sat home and let Donald Trump win instead to teach her a lesson.

A lesson libs like you clearly have yet to learn. Kamala alienated parts of what should have been her electoral coalition, because she wouldn't distance herself from Biden who was deeply unpopular, wouldn't take a proper stance on Palestine, and adopted Republican border policy. Running to the right doesn't work.

To platner's credit, he's not doing that (ot at least hasn't yet. We'll see what he does if in office), but he's a controversial candidate for good reason.

Also, you need to understand that people are capable of making mistakes and growing from them. Making one mistake in your life doesn’t disqualify you from ever participating in anything ever again. Get the fuck over it.

I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. I don't think anyone is beyond redemption. I'm a prison abolitionist ffs. But if you can't see why the SS tattoo might give people pause, you're just not taking a sober look at the situation.

You people have no plan. Your solution is what? Don’t vote or vote for Susan Collins? Either way, you’re supporting the Republicans and therefore supporting Trump. You are therefore my enemy.

Ok, take a deep breath, and chill out. I am a stranger on the internet. You don't know me, and you don't know if I voted, or who for. Voting is a tool. It is one singular means of political engagement. Not every election is the most important election ever, and whether someone chooses to vote for someone like Kamala, or Platner, is up to them. Those people aren't necessarily your enemies, they're people who's conscience told them to take a position different from yours.

Unionize your workplace, if it's already unionized, get involved. Canvas for a ballot measure, or attend a city council meeting. Find a mutual aid network in your area and hand out food or hygine kits to the homeless. Opposing Trump is sometimes about voting, but it's also about building something beyond the systems which allowed him to come to power in the first place.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you think that a 3 tour (or was it 4?) Blackwater merc is going to move you left, you are the reason why the party isn't moving left.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 99 points 2 days ago (32 children)

Do we have a time machine? No? Then we can't make a better choice for primary than him anymore. That's it.

Is he better than Susan Collins?

That's the vote. A or B. Decide which, between those two options only you'd hate the least, and vote the vote.

Is he imperfect? Yes. But now he's only competing against Ms Collins.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well that’s fucking depressing

[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's fair, but we're actively living the consequences of not voting for harm reduction when we had the chance in 2024. I'm so fucking sick of this. We can't afford to ignore history or reality anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

His speech called “No one is coming to save us” dropped so many truth bombs. I was like FINALLY A POLITICIAN WHO SOUNDS REAL.

[–] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 days ago (10 children)

He says enough good things that he’s worth throwing some weight behind. Importantly too, (and unfortunate it has to be this way) he’s a macho white veteran. He’s speaking TOO and FOR this demographic who happens to have too much weight in the US political discourse.

A lot of what he says I generally agree with, but he is, like any politician, imperfect. He’s the best we got against Susan Collins though. If his image can be the voice of reason to this demographic of desperately macho white dudes in the US, then let’s ride the wave until someone better comes along.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

All you out of staters sound like some clown in Texas foaming at the mouth over the mayor of New York. Big clown energy. Calm down eyes on the prize focus on your own representation. This one’s mine. You can go reelect your little DNC clown so they can fund Israel and we could keep bombing brown people forever instead of getting healthcare.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

99 other seats you could be worried about, 2 of which belong to each of you. Go put that energy into your own elections ya jackasses.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Senators serve 6 year terms, and their terms are staggered so that only a third of them up for reelection during any given cycle, so there are only 33 (maybe 34) other elections to worry about right now. Factor in popular sitting senators who are unlikely to receive a primary or general challenge this year, and there are really only a handful of senate seats tor people to be concerned about. Off the top of my head, I can only think of Platner/Mills and Paxton/Talerico for the general elections, and the primary between Markey/Moulton (and I'm not sure if that has national attention or it's just news to me because I live in Massachusetts).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›