this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
63 points (86.2% liked)

politics

25308 readers
2698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a battle between two Californians considering Democratic runs for president in 2028, Gov. Gavin Newsom holds a slight edge over former Vice President Kamala Harris, according to a new poll.

The poll, conducted by Politico and The Citrin Center public opinion firm, found Newsom is the top choice of 25% of California's Democratic voters in the 2028 Democratic primary, leading all prospective candidates including Harris, the 2024 Democratic nominee, who is supported by 19% of the state's Democrats.

The two high-profile Californians are followed in the poll by former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (13%), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (10%), Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (4%) and New Jersey U.S. Sen. Cory Booker (4%).

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 minutes ago

I don’t want newsom to run

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 hours ago

I think we should look to outside talent. The lettuce that outlasted Liz Truss is available and probably more personable despite several years of decomposition.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lol at all this cute discussion like there's going to be a 2028 election...

At the current rate things are going it's unlikely we'll have 2026 mid-terms.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

The midterms will happen but it’s gonna be all gerrymandered. 2028, hah yeah… not counting on that

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Democrats is somehow always able to find worse candidates than the last one...

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 47 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

An Ocasio-Cortez / Walz ticket would be a dream come true. I believe Newsom is too much of a neoliberal and opportunist to actually begin to revert the US into a progressive state, and would ultimately cause someone like DeSantis to be elected afterwards.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Waltz/AOC would have a much better chance of success since America is still pretty sexist.

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am well aware. But my dream is AOC / Walz for 2 terms, then Walz and his VP pick

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

"Okay, we've had a 40 year old president now. Time to switch back to someone pushing 70."

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Walz/AOC would also work

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I just vomited a lot a bit...

Edit: honestly I've been having this reaction a lot when hearing about neo liberals and fascists. The first part of your comment is my dream and the last part is feeling like the nightmare reality.

[–] PacketPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can we do something like this for whoever ends up being the nominee? At this point I just want MAGAts to suffer and have their own shit shoved down their throats.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 hours ago

Are those… real?!

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 hours ago

Fuuuuck the DNC. I really hope that people actually vote in the primaries, if they actually happen, and we don't end up with another fucking corporate fellating Dem on the ticket for the general election. Then again, I don't want to hear about the goddamn next presidential election when the mid-terms are next in line.

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Newsom can top all the Democrats he wants, i am still not going to support him.

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

His ability to match Trumpian trolling style needs to be picked up by someone new, or else we should really get behind this guy at least he is not literally a child raping Russian asset sent to destroy America JFC it's hard to be picky here

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Great, so you are another fascist enabler. You dont need to like his policies but if he is the person to stop the fascist and you dont support him or even vote for him you are on the side of the fascists.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You dont need to like his policies

That's just it: his policies are how he governs. Awful Neoliberal policies devastating working people to the point that most can barely afford to live is (along with billionaire-owned yellow media) how things got bad enough for a resurgence of fascism.

That being said, the Neoliberal style of campaigning where the vast majority of their messaging is aimed at converting the increasingly tiny sliver of a demographic that have voted GOP and would ever in a million years vote Dem while ignoring the leftmost two thirds of their own base is a losing strategy that lost to the most unqualified and repulsive presidential candidate in living memory if not ever. TWICE.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There's no point engaging with this type of idiot.

They're just disagreeable generally and completely incapable of understanding compromise.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I honestly can’t believe they haven’t learned the consequences of doing nothing when the bare minimum would have saved so many people.

I am left to believe that trump’s bot campaign is back in full force because frankly, I cannot believe someone can be this willfully ignorant.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... that's a pretty low bar, though, right? Kamala just set the world record for fastest time from hype to revulsion any politician has ever achieved and pulled her entire party along into the grave she dug herself.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What world are you living in?

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Ok, why do you think she lost the general election and the popular vote then?

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

The world where people would rather live with a party of literal fucking nazis than sully themselves with anything less than their ideal.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Seeing as how Kamala has barely said a word in the last year, I think it is no surprise she's sliding on the popularity scale. I'm guessing she's planning on sliding into obscurity. Hope she proves otherwise.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago

Hope she proves otherwise.

I'm hoping she doesn't. Harris has done nothing of value to the American people, and in fact treated her own base with such contempt that she lost to Donald fucking Trump. She and her ilk should all fuck off to the other side of the moon and let people with something resembling principles take the lead.