this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
93 points (97.9% liked)

politics

30954 readers
2069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

They're taking so long because they know Trump won't follow through on his threats. More threats aren't going to make them hurry up.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

More accurately they know trump won't follow through on the negotiations. Trump says he's going to bomb you, there's a 50/50 chance he will bomb you. Trump says he's going to talk peacefully, there's a 100% chance either the US or Isreal is going to be bombing durring or before the negotiations and during whatever cease fire is negotiated.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How fucking funny would it be if we wake up tomorrow and Iran has drone struck the white house, similar to how Ukraine did with Russia last year?

That would be the most unexpected and hilarious ending to Trump I can think of.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That would be absolutely terrible.

Currently, the general US sentiment seems to be that Trump is an internal problem, that you have to deal with.

An attack on the White House would not be seen as an attack against Trump, it would be seen as an attack against the nation as a whole.

We have an example of this, look at the approval rating of Bush before and after 9/11, they surged from just barely over 50% to above 90% instantly.

Now, I don't expect this huge of a jump with Trump, but I there would absolutely be a huge jump in Trump's approval ratings after a foreign attack on the White House.

Plenty of people would see it as their duty to support the president in those times.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For the 30% of lead poisoned weirdos, maybe.

During the theater run of Independence Day, people in the theater often cheered when the white house was destroyed.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that was a movie, though

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe that Americans know the difference between the WTC and the Trump White House

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I believe that Americans know the difference between the WTC and the Trump White House

C and H! Do I win?

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then instead of the White House, Mar-a-lago🤷‍♂️

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

it would be seen as an attack against the nation as a whole.

So? USA is also absolutely attacking Iran as a nation as a whole. USA has set the precedence that Iran is absolutely allowed and even justified in doing this. And I for one would not lift a finger to help USA, but will continue to boycott American products.
USA created this mess together with Israel, and USA shouldn't come fucking crying to Europe if the White House is bombed!!
Like USA did when Iran closed the Hormuz Strait. 😡
Iran is clearly the victim here. Iran may be a shitty country, but on the international scene USA is worse.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, in the hypothetical example I believe the implication was not one that trump survived. So a better analogy would be turning point USA. Of which yeah general like and "honoring" of charlie certainly went up. But on the whole the influence of turning point USA seems to be less. As far as the overall, I'm not sure how to really judge how that would go in this hypothetical would b long term.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We live in the shit timeline, we don't get nice things like that. We get undying Trump who lives like another 40 years as president and bullets fly around him like that stupid movie Wanted...

[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isn't a video game. Iranian drones with the ability to strike the white house wouldn't be "nice things".
Iran aren't the good guys and war is always shit. No exceptions.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Who said this is a video game? I want Trump to die plain and simple. Suffering would be a bonus.

To elaborate, no I don't want innocent people in the white house to die, but the gist of the initial comment was essentially eluding to trump being killed which was the concept I was supporting.

War does suck 100% of the time and there are no good guys in this world. Iran, US, or otherwise.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm guessing you are thinking about operation spiderweb, where Ukraine released drones deep inside Russia from Russian registered trucks, and took out several fighter jets and very valuable AWACS.
Yes such an attack on white house taking out Trump would be hilarious, and absolutely justified karma as deserved, considering USA did the same to Iranian politicians.
I would worry however what the response to such an action would be?

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

They also know Trump won’t keep his end of the deal.

Trump can't follow through on his threats.

The US doesnt have the conventional arsenal left to do what he wants, and none of the middle eastern countries(minus Israel) would allow a nuclear attack.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Trump won’t follow through on his threats.

He "won't" because he can't, but I bet Trump wants to nuke Iran if necessary, he has no moral boundaries and doesn't give a shit about the human suffering he is causing.
His only fear is about the possible consequences to himself, and maybe he has even been actively prevented from doing it?

My guess is that Trump absolutely wants to follow through, but he can't. Partly because congress won't allow it, but there may be other reasons, like the military may have finally refused an illegal order?

Trump is mentally a toddler, and he will go as far as he can, until someone stops him.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago

Sorry, but short attention spans combined with deliberately minimized education levels will ensure that not only are most Americans not ready, but that they will blame whoever has the misfortune to be in charge when the aftereffects of everything Trump has done finally firmly take hold. My fellow ~~Americans~~ morons haven't a clue what "looking at the big picture" means.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Inflation rose to 4.2% based on today's reports and you've got ExxonMobil and Chevron CEOs warning of severe energy spikes in July and Aug....gonna be fun....

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's going to hit everyone, not just us.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago

To my knowledge, America is the only country that has yet to undeniably experience economic shock from this war. The rest of the world is already suffering from America's imperialism. The worse Americans are seeing is slightly inflated gas and goods pricing, which can be brushed off as usual economic waves.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You know the answer to that.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Donald Trump is a pedophile rapist pile of shit.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Both off-topic, and completely relevant.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They are holding all the cards — we shall pay the price.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure we are already paying 'the price'.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. But there will be more that we haven’t felt yet, I’m sure.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Per the article, I suspect you are right. I'm in a uniquely fortunate position, in that I live in a small town, and mostly use a bike for transport. All the same, I like to eat food and am not realistically able to grow all I consume. And I need to replace bike parts now and again. At some point the computer in front of me will need replacement, etc, etc. Sigh.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Small towner here, as well. I feel and share your pain.

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

this strategy seems to have worked well for Greenland and Canada. Grey rocking at an International scale.

Oh time for the thinly veiled nuclear threats again because it's Wednesday?

[–] J3N5T4R@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

There is no negotiation. Iran gave their demands and Trump the narcissist fuckup will never take an L an give those demands.

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Oh man they better hurry up before Trump does something crazy… like give Iran an even better deal.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago

Tough talk from Donald Donkeybrains.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 4 points 2 months ago

Bet you a gallon of gas that it’s not going to happen.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

He totally means it this time guys.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

[ X ] DOUBT

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Someone blow his fucking brains out already.

Go on anarchists. Do actual shit for a change.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Like Mexico paid for the wall?

Iran has no reason to suspect the USA will ever hold up a deal with the dementia addled moldy orange much less GQP's next dictator. As well I don't think the USA military is capable of trying to fight an outright war with even a modestly equipped foe. Iran isn't the Taliban.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why are his eyes so goddamned bloodshot all the time?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not sleeping?

Eye strain from constantly checking social media?

Old age?

Coke?

Syphilis?

High blood pressure from a decades long diet of hamberders?

[–] DevDave@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

More terror attacks by the USA. Non-targeted bombing campaigns or operations focused on civilians has never won a war but it has spread misery far and wide. The people leading the war are either out of range or in a bunker deep enough that it might as well be on the other side of the planet. Even if you "glass" major cities, that's not where the missiles are located.

[–] newton@feddit.online 2 points 2 months ago

Wrong as always , the big bill is for the average american