this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
357 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
1958 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 minutes ago

Where do you think grok gets the info?

Mein Kampf.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 44 minutes ago (2 children)

Is there a term for people who only get answers from Ai?

Like some AI cuck?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 24 minutes ago

I've seen cogsuckers used before.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 39 minutes ago

Ah yes, those people with brAIns

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 1 points 17 minutes ago

And hence why we call it "métrage" in French, as in "un long métrage" (a feature film) and "in court métrage" (a short film) ; because we measure in metres !

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 51 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Sadly I have generally watched in horror as my friends quote Gemini slop as fact checking on the regular, because it's the default search result.

I speak up about it, and explain why it's problematic. Doesn't matter. It's convenient.

Convenience always wins.

We're cooked.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

I know people that will complain about the crappy results but then not use a different search engine. Like it's too much cognitive load to go to duckduckgo or qwant or whatever

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

Hmm, makes me wonder if a big factor is that it reads the first couple of results and summarizes it. Like if it was turned off, people wouldn't bother clicking through and reading, so they just leave and and "fact" get saved in their brains. If they were really motivated, they would click through and read and come to the same incorrect conclusions but most don't bother so the misinformation doesn't propagate as easily

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 14 points 2 hours ago

ROFL I always wonder if we are totally cooked as a society, if the billionaires are going to get what they want. Sometimes, I think so. However, there are enough people that thing LLMs are total bullshit and won't be lured in. Good on Merriam-Webster to clap back on grok induced stupidity!

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 41 minutes ago

Merriam Webster is my least trusted dictionary. Meanings and words I've looked up in the past have been either inaccurate or biased to a North American understanding. I use English English, and prefer Cambridge and (secondary due to online paywall) Oxford (UK ver.).

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Merriam-Webster is a source of factual information. Factual information is woke or something. Elon doesn't allow grok to consider anything woke in its answers. Therefore grok doesn't get the info from Merriam-Webster.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 47 minutes ago

@gork is this real??2?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

There are many different tiers and types of AI users. Anyone who uses Grok might not be eligible for the death penalty in the US due to diminished capacity.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

They would in a type of society where it's considered evidence of imperfect genes.

[–] TacticalToothbrush@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We have "Schadenfreude". We're gonna need a word for physical pain caused by witnessing such stupidity.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

@grok how do i wipe my ass after poop?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

GROK: Go waterskiing naked & sitting down, only do it on a road with a car.

USER: Sounds fun, thx!

[–] CorvusCornix@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago

To be fair, I wouldn't expect grok to be using actual facts and reputable sources as its baseline knowledge, given its owner.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

If you're lucky, this is where it gets its info.

[–] x264@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

@grok explain this I lack braincells

[–] lime@feddit.nu -2 points 3 hours ago

i'd always thought it had the same root as "photograph"