this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
900 points (96.1% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
1938 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

maybe it happened

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

"Hi. I hope this date finds you well" stuff. Heh, I'd cancel too.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

AI can be pretty good at finding local events and activity suggestions. Is Googling it any better?

Why is googling it the alternative?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

Since google is now using AI for all that shit, probably not.

Kicking and screaming we will go... or we'll be the new version of the hippies that bought farms and started compounds in the 70's.

The only thing that might save us is the price of AI scraping the web being so expensive it's not worth it and we get real search engines again.

We can't even be saved by social media local scopes because the stores and event managers are using AI, the social media is using it to deliver the results to us.

It's shitty, but the guy just did the equivalent of running an ai enabled google or facebook search.

[–] marretics@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 20 hours ago

Are you for real? For me it just keeps spewing out locations and events that do not exist or that have been closed since forever

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

If it does it, it does, no need to explicitly and proactively credit it.

It's less about this specific isolated incident and more about what it suggests broadly about their behavior with respect to ChatGPT.

But even for this specific incident, I'd even say that while less controversial, saying "I'll just google up what to do" would also be a bit of a let down. It suggests a lack of thoughtfulness even if that's really what someone does. Ask for input and then come back with your plans without referring to how you are leaning on some tech, so the person can at least think maybe you put in a measure of actual thought and effert.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I'm always suspicious of tweets where the author defeats a strawman but this followup post has me pretty convinced of its inauthenticity

No, I have literally never done that. I have never once in my life confused the two lol

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a really weird reason to think it's fake. There are plenty of reasons, not least that it's on the internet at all, but this describes a very normal human thought error. I understand it's not the type of mistake any individual person would necessarily make, but if you don't understand that some people definitely would, I think you could use more insight into the variety of personalities and thought processes which exist.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I was suspicious it was fake already because it's written like an attention-seeking LinkedIn post. Then the followup reads like a "oops, I didn't mean to post that picture...but since you all liked it..." post everyone sees through on Myspace. Who writes like that to their friends?

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you are a lemmy user... a rare breed. She is on twitter and all these other platforms chirpin. I could believe. Yet it might be bogus but it still hits.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Ok, but the tone of her post wasn't the tone of a private message to someone, or to a private group that knows her.

There's too much effort in establishing the full context about her being a widow and exactly how long and just the tone of the post screams public post not private message to friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mgrecca2026@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 day ago (11 children)

telling a date that u use a chatbot to decide is lame

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Using the chat bot to make your plans in the first place is even more lame.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›