this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
970 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

11951 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jenings@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Tankies will continue to say both sides same

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Tankies really follow the will of the despots.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

I'm not a tankie, and I agree with "bOtH sIdEs SaMe" in regards to being pro-military, and pro-corporate, and anti-labor, for example.

Sure, they have some differences, too. But really not that many.

The major parties have another "sAmE"... they are both less than 30% of the voters now. Independents are now 40% of the voters (pick your poll, there are many). So... of course your party machine surrounds you with "both sides" disparagement and talking points.

Good, it's to be expected.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 hours ago

Which side is against genocide? Which side is against war?

[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Remember when the Dems controlled all three bodies and for all that non stop hysterial talk about gun control what happened?.....crickets ..... no change. Why would anyone expect change from either side is always my question.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I’d rather take no change than chaos. What do you expect will happen?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry when was this that dems had filibuster proof control of house, senate and presidency for a while?

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Probably when they put through romneycare.

[–] Mordred_85@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Roaring 30s

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Allowing presidents to pick your justices and then giving them jobs for life is the stupidest system ever created. Ripe for abuse.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago

A country built on the back of genocide and slavery is the stupidest system ever created. Ripe for abuse.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

What so bizarre is SCOTUS has always been conservative. We get a couple of judges who are not hardcore conservatives and they help make a couple of rulings that aren't just one sided conservative nonsense and suddenly "they are taking over the judiciary with activist judges".

So the conservatives do exactly this, they start stacking their already suck ass conservative courts that always rule for big business with even more extreme ideological fucktards. Every accusation is a confession I suppose.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

They have to get approved by our Congress too it's just that they're also not doing their jobs well.

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is higher than 0% chance that DJT won't reach a deal with Iran "Soon", the possibility of oil crisis and economic recession are still very real.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I want the price of gas to be $25 dollars per gallon

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I want the collapse and dissolution of the United States.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I want the balkanization of the United States and $65 dollars a gallon!

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I volunteer as tribute in the Hunger Games? Ugh.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Tomato / tomatah!

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

The chance is 100% lol, have you been paying attention?

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Right now, prices and availability are being kept semi stable by draw downs on strategic reserves, but that won’t last forever.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Hell, it probably won’t last another month.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 173 points 1 day ago (5 children)

a failure so spectacular, it lead to fdr, the new deal..... republicans wouldn't win the white house back until 1952.

Ranked choice voting can help mitigate this issue

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And only 6 years after they finally got the Whitehouse again, they started plotting for the next massive fuck up era by founding the John Birch Society (which is a major cause for the GOP's current psychosis.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't forget about the McCarthyism of the late 40s and the 50s. Ronald Reagan was involved with that particular movement since the beginning when he testified in front of Congress (specifically the House Un-American Activities Committee) saying that communists were taking over Hollywood.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that wasn't ike, though. those nutcases thought he was a commie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but the Democrats were competent back then. I don't have confidence in most of the modern Democrats. There are only like 3 of them who seem to get what's going on

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 23 hours ago

A lot of that comes from the development of corporate lobbyists and special interest groups in the 1970s. Even then they were highly regulated, and oversized campaign contributions still counted as bribes. That all changed after Reagan got into office, and Gucci Gulch got unfettered access to elected officials. After that, a lot of politicians were too tempted by the prospect of getting fantastically wealthy and forgot about the dream of changing the world for the better.

A lot of this isn't really new. To quote Rutherford B. Hayes, The real difficulty is with the vast wealth and power in the hands of the few and the unscrupulous who represent or control capital. Hundreds of laws of Congress and the state legislatures are in the interest of these men and against the interests of workingmen. These need to be exposed and repealed. All laws on corporations, on taxation, on trusts, wills, descent, and the like, need examination and extensive change. This is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations.

So the influence of wealth and corporate interest on political power is, in fact, an old problem. What frustrates me is how reforms could have been made during their rare collective moments of conscience, and they didn't. To be fair, civil liberties of non-whites and women were a higher priority.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

fingers crossed history repeats itself lol

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't want another world war, or Jim Crow...

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we're already in the middle of both of those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

Definitely not the flex they think it is.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The Trump depression is going to make 2008 look like a picnic.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I'm already very depressed!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In their view the Great Depression was probably started by a bunch of lazy woke activists who didn't want to work, thus spurring the dust bowl with their uh, inaction. Dust everywhere. No one dusting.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago

They should sweep the forests, like they do in sweden

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's what Republican's do best; fuck up the economy.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

Conservatives are – and have always been – the enemy of the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There will be inflation and you will love it.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Great Depression featured deflation, for whatever the hell that's worth.

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

I mean, that seems like that would be nice to have, at least for a bit...

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That was before the Southern Strategy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

The same shit as right now.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

They don't know a lot of things

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • Massive amounts of what effectively amounts to gambling on the stock market.
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Somehow screwworm has returned

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›