Technology

Interesting thing here; I drive a 2013 vehicle. Other than regular maintenance, the only repair it’s ever needed was a rear bumper replacement and a bit of bodywork when someone rear ended me at a stoplight.

Contrast this with vehicles from the 1950s-1990s where sure, you could affordably repair them yourself or at the local garage, BUT that was something that became a regular event after the vehicle was 4-5 years old.

Personally, I’m more concerned with how manufacturers are closing off sections of the software in their vehicles such that it can’t be audited, security reviewed, independently patched, or modified to prevent all the telematics from flowing back to them.

Improved reliability is, ironically a major cause of this problem.

Buyers of brand new cars in the USA keep them for fewer than ten years on average. If most cars can go ten years without needing major repairs, the car manufacturer's actual customer is not strongly motivated to consider repairability in buying decisions. The second or third owner likely cares a lot, but their preferences don't matter very much to manufacturers.

Now there's a job for Doug Ford: to build old-fashioned cars that don't need electronics. According to what I see online, Doug Ford's builders and Doug Ford's buyers would both like that.

My Truck will kick me off Apple Car play so it can send its data to Ford. The infotainment center is too weak to process both and my connection just crashes. I'm not mad though. I'm actually happy Ford is able to get the data the need at my expense. This is how it should be.

Just buy a car from a company who pulled out of the American market, like Diahatsu or SAAB or some other. Problem solved. 👍

TBF, almost nobody who buys a BMW has ever even opened their hood. 😉