this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
121 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30195 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a lot of awful things being done under Trump, but this blatant and open voter disenfranchisement by the Republicans in a bunch of states is in my top ten, and very worrisome. It's among a few things that make me worry the midterms aren't going to go like people think they will.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm optimistic about the midterms, because Republicans are still trying to rig them, which means they don't think they've cheated enough to win yet.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I like your way of looking at it!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But aren't they weakening the overall districts? Maybe it doesn't matter in these districts, not sure.

By doing it this way, rather than grouping most of Salt Lake City into one Democratic stronghold and creating three safely Republican seats, Republicans have an opportunity to maintain control of all four House seats next year.

But they have also risked creating a so-called dummymander — a gerrymandered map that backfires against the party it’s intended to favor. Republicans drew two light-red districts — one more competitive than the other — that could both potentially flip toward Democrats in a year that strongly favors them.

Along with two safe Republican seats, the new map, which must still be signed by Gov. Spencer Cox and approved by a judge, creates one district that Trump won by about seven percentage points last year, and another district that Trump won by about 2 points.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/08/us/politics/on-politics-utah-redistricting.html

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Yes, but not by enough to matter. It'll still take more than 60% of the votes going for Democrats to change who holds power. Gerrymandering has gotten really effective, and the peolle drawing the maps know in advance which way most households are inclined to vote.