this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
724 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Proposed legislation behind the impending US government shutdown contains provisions that would ban federal funding for transgender adults, as well as youngsters.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 12 points 7 hours ago

How dreadful! For many trans people it'll endanger their lives.

It all reminds me of what was happening in Russia over the decades, just smashed into an impossible timeline. Small steps lead to irrevocable disasters.

[–] Trill88@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Why so fragile

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

lets refuse to fund his magic bed

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EldenLord@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago

At this point, even the most die-hard republicans should be horribly ashamed by the fact this "man" is even allowed to participate in politics.

Eh, who am I kidding? Few bad apples spoil the bunch, and it‘s already happened worldwide. Trump has become only a symptom of the wretched corruption that is everywhere.

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 42 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Still scrolling down looking for the basic Transgender Solidarity post but I guess allies are sleeping in....

Trans dance party starts here. I am starting the dance party.

Then we can take a break and write our reps and remind our friends and go back to our daily revolutionary work of staying alive and experiencing joy three steps ahead of the murderbigots.

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago

Ally here, can confirm, was sleeping in. I'm up in Canada though, so trying to make positive change up here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Trump will do a thousand crazy things to deflect from his children rapes. Look here! Look there! Look up! Look down! Look left! What a maroon. A dangerous maroon. (Not a misspelling but a Bugs Bunny reference).

[–] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Diabolical sabotage...

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 37 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

All trans healthcare? Does that mean all transition-related care? Or all healthcare to trans people?

My moneys on both

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It would bar federal funding from going to any hospital or medical facility that provides gender-affirming care, including HRT. Like a Hyde Amendment for trans healthcare. Basically, no medical facility that wants to take Medicaid or Medicare would be able to provide gender-affirming care. Oh, you’ve got an entire hospital? That’s nice, but you have a single endo who prescribes HRT, so no funding at all for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like it's a misdirection. Like, this isn't what he really wants. This is a ploy to get/do something way, way worse. Or use this to cover up the Epstein files or something. He'll use the shutdown and a hot button topic to get what he sees as a big fish...

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why couldn’t it also be what he really wants? What part of anything happening in the US and anything coming from the right could possibly signal that they don’t want this?

Conservatism is a cancer and fascism is perfectly happy to turn that knob up to 11.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because if he plays that card now, he doesn't get to use it again. If he keeps it in his back pocket, he gets to manipulate more people for longer. And it's a win/win for him regardless.

What ground would the democratic party be willing to give up to ensure it doesn't happen now.... what about in 6 months, next year, etc. One thing I'm pretty sure he wants more than anything is a 3rd term. So, unless they have a bulletproof way to stop him from taking health care away, it's something he can keep weaponizing.

I'd love to be wrong, but he seems to like to kick up a lot of noise before his real plan is shown.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 8 points 9 hours ago

Also, dems should demand epstein files be released to prevent a shutdown.

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Go for it, you first.

[–] catarina@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck this ridiculous man and his supporters. We should offer asylum in Europe for the people he's basically persecuting and denying basic rights to.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Great that we in Europe also like to piss on the rights of trans people. Just take a look at terf island or Hungary. If I remember right Poland also introduced some shit regulations on trans people, but dont count me on that.

And no I dont want to say, that the situation across Europe is the same as in the USA, but we better be careful, that the same shit doesn't happen here too.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

I fear the US is just ahead of the curve. This trend is slowly getting everywhere.

The Bell Riots were apparently a decade or so off.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 21 points 13 hours ago

Well I guess no more gender affirming surgeries for balding fat loser white guys also then.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wait I thought you had medbeds for everyone?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 6 hours ago

Not for trans people. They are for white straight guys only 😤

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Do it, fash.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 64 points 17 hours ago

Oh no! I guess the ONLY Option is to Ban ALL Transgender Healthcare in American in exchange for NOTHING!

-Chuck Schumer!

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 79 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

CALL HIS FUCKING BLUFF!

LET HIM DO IT AND FAIL OR WITHDRAW AND BE WEAK

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›