this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
19 points (91.3% liked)

politics

30135 readers
2330 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Slim margins are what they want. They're fine with this. Democratic party is just controlled opposition and nothing will change if they come into power.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Three thoughts:

  • A 3-4 point "slim" lead is absurd as we watch Trump light the country, our savings, and future generations' financial stability on fire.
  • I don't pretend to know what will happen this fall but "disappointed" seems like the correct left-leaning calibration since 2016.
  • I am so sick of right-biased political minority rule in this country. Since 2000 have we at any time had a presidency, senate, and House that were all controlled by the party that got the most votes in a given election?
[–] dcpDarkMatter@kbin.earth 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
  1. Dems swept in, riding Obama's coattails and the Great Financial Collapse.
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Ah, thank you.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

On June 15, CNN's Harry Enten warned that several high-quality polls show Democrats leading the generic congressional ballot by only about 3 points, short of the benchmark set in past wave years.

This matters because Republican-led redistricting has tilted the House map, so Democrats need a clear 3- to 4-point national edge just to win back the chamber.

[–] dcpDarkMatter@kbin.earth 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Considering most of the high-quality polls taken a few weeks ago all showed a drubbing for Rs in November, down nearly 8 points, I wonder what caused the huge shift in such a short time.

Edit: Just checked a HQ poll from almost literally a month ago. It had Dems up +11. WTF happened to cause an 8 point swing? These smaller lead polls would've had to have been done during the war, so I can't imagine that any temporary buff at the war's "ending" factors into it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 52 minutes ago

Ellison bought CNN, and even if it isn't a full-fledged member of the Conservative Propaganda Machine YET, it should now be considered unreliable and untrustworthy.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Wait for how bad it'll be when Vance pivots to antizionism. Schumer needs to go after the midterms either way