this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
228 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31105 readers
2293 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
228
Prairieland ‘Antifa’ Activists Sentenced to Decades in Prison on ‘Terrorism’ Charges (talkingpointsmemo.com)
submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 98 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Benjamin Song was sentenced to 100 years in prison and Maricela Rueda to 70. Savanna Batten, Elizabeth Soto, Meaghan Morris, Autumn Hill, and Zachary Evetts each received sentences of 50 years. Daniel Sanchez Estrada, who was not at the demonstration, was sentenced to 30 years on charges relating to concealing documents in the investigation.

A disgusting abuse of power.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Fascism by pedos

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

If theyre going to flat out fucking lie and disappear people like this, there is literallu nothing to lose by hitting back hard.

[–] la508@lemmy.world 85 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Savanna Batten and Elizabeth Soto, two area activists, were not alleged to have belonged to discussion groups where the demonstration was planned. In Batten’s case, prosecutors relied on her black garb as a means to tie her to the conspiracy; in Soto’s, prosecutors argued that her black clothing and her operation of a small printing press that produced anarchist “zines” tied her to the conspiracy. Both received sentences of 50 years on Tuesday.

Fascism.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 20 points 2 months ago

What do you expect from a shithole country

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds like they would have either been significantly better off, or at minimum no worse off, had they followed through and executed every fascist on site, leave no fascist witnesses.

Take notes. Learn. Do better.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 19 points 2 months ago

If you resist an officer of the state in any benign way. They will charge you with assault etc. If you find yourself firing on them, there is no forgiveness. Or no harm no foul. Even if you don't hit anyone, the state will still bury you one way or another. So yeah, once you start it. You better make it worth it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They want to make people afraid to protest, but it'll end up like 3 strikes laws...

If some idiot takes shit too far, and now you're facing 50 years because you happened to be walking past in a black hoodie at that moment....

At the drop of the hat in a heated moment, people suddenly have nothing to lose. People are going to start acting like cornered animals in the moment, because cooperating is worse than death even if innocent.

It'll be like the movie Heat where the hothead kills a cop, everyone is pissed, but the response in the moment is to wipe out all the cops because 1 dead cop is just as bad as 3 dead cops.

Once you cross that line, numbers no longer matter.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

After reading about the conditions in the warehouse camps I'm inclined not to go to any 2nd location with those ghouls.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That's exactly why when they pivoted to "final solution" they hid it. A lot of Germans just legitimately didn't know until the very end or even after.

But even past Americans invading, people were being forced on trains.

I learned German from someone whose earliest memory was Americans ambushing her train to a concentration camp. She doesn't remember being forced on, because it was bleak but peaceful. No overt violence. But when they were liberated and had to run into the woods, it was absolute chaos with explosions and gunfire.

It's always stuck with me because it highlights how fascism succeeds; when people only plan for the moment and not the future.

The French culturally learned how to fight; go to the streets at the drop of a hat and you'll never have to choose between protest or death. They drew a line in the sand well away from fascism and repeatedly shown they'll burn it all down before shit gets that far again. So the wealthy don't risk fascism there anymore.

If people had burnt down Tesla factories a decade ago, we would be where we are today, that's a hard truth.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buried in this:

During jury selection that morning, local press reports said, around three-quarters of prospective jurors expressed opposition to President Trump and ICE.

This is a case in Texas. While grave injustice is being done in terms of the state’s actions, this is a good signal for “average American” and their reaction to these policies.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, also maybe explains a bit about the guilty verdicts in the first place - I bet every single one of those prospective jurors got rejected and the prosecution didn't have to spend any of their challenges to do it because being opposed to ICE meant they were "biased"

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Yup. And every juror that was sat either was a lying MAGAt or was just as naïve as one and therefore thought they actually were sentencing terrorists.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Both the defence and prosecution can reject jurors. So defence could reject anyone who supports ICE

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Normally you only get a certain number of rejections to prevent dragging out the process. So if being "against Ice" is structural bias, while being "pro ice" counts against your three or whatever rejections...the jury will be pro ice.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been on a jury. There was no limit to the number of rejections. It took them days to pick a jury.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Huh, every single state court system does things differently so maybe there was no limit in your case, but there is definitely a limit in federal trials, see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 24, part (b) here - https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24 (arc)

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 21 points 2 months ago

If ONLY they had MURDERED ICE Agents or RAPED Children THEN they would have had a MUCH Lighter Sentence!

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I fully understand this.... Like apart from the punter who shot the cop, the others are getting an average of 50 years each for vandalism. Is that correct?

My mind genuinely cannot comprehend that. Like you don't get that for murder in most places.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also the guy who shot the cop did it in defense.

The cop escalated by raising a loaded firearm first.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

That's U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman for the Northern District of Texas in DfW making this decision on the record.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Trump is a pedophile and Texas gov Abbott pardons jury convicted murderers, no charges for the ICE agents who gunned down citizens in broad daylight, and collective punishment is a crime against humanity under systems of justice.