this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
119 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30165 readers
3156 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Few qualities carry more weight for Donald Trump than loyalty, and few aides embody it as fully as his executive assistant, Natalie Harp.

A former TV presenter, Harp is a near-constant presence at Trump’s side — encouraging his Oval Office redesigns, typing up his Truth Social tirades and printing out online articles, a role that has earned her the nickname “the human printer.” She also leaves behind admiring notes for him to discover. Her devotion is so pronounced that the 80-year-old Republican once declared: “She’ll never leave me.”

These details about one of the most influential White House aides were revealed by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan in their new book Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 45 seconds ago

Choosing to be an old pedophile's cum rag would be sad if it wasn't so disgusting

[–] iz_ok@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Nothing to back this up but I assume she is some type of foreign asset. Not that they would really need to much to influence him but a pretty blonde lady is absolutely the winning move.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 5 points 35 minutes ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

Imagine how low you must value yourself to sign up for that gig....

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 minutes ago

Idk, as a foreign asset... Look, you'd be the ultimate bootlicker, but if you were fully bought into your nation as a project, sucking off one shit-crusted diaper dick to bend a global superpower to your whims is not a bad deal.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 17 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get it, what's suspicious about a skinny 34-year-old blonde wanting to spend all her time around an 80-year-old diaper-smelling man-child who has literally nothing valuable about his life or personality except his fleeting grasp of unearned power and money?

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

YEA! just let people love eachother man! freelove! They're all consenting adults, age gaps a commie liberul myth, amirite? It's not illegal so there's nothing wrong about a rich man having a gf who happens to be 50 years younger than them. That's just called capitalism in action. Free love and free markets, amirite brothers?

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 1 points 43 minutes ago

Natalie Harp honest to God sounds like a fake name a foreign asset would have. For real.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 78 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not a cult, by the way. The rest of us are deranged.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

At their level it's not a cult, it's weekend at Bernie's.

They know he's a pathetic sack of shit, but they know all they have to do is kiss his ass and deflect blame.

Some hit their limit and can't keep up the act, they get replaced. Eventually all that's left is blind sycophants with zero limits.

At the level of voters, it's a cult. Just not for those around him constantly.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

She looks like Ivanka, possibly a handler of some billionaire and/or foreign power?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

I bet she is handling something

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Private spaces", like inside his diaper?

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 3 hours ago

Maggie Haberman could have made a little less by being a reporter-whistleblower-hero, but that would have been risking her skin and bank account balance, rather than growing that balance.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

Didn’t work for firecracker and won’t work for her