Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It passed 85-5 in the Senate and 358-32 in the House. Fucking pissbaby throwing another tantrum.
No one tell him it will become law in 10 days if he does nothing.
I thought it was the opposite; pocket veto?
If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a Law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a Law.
And these days, Congress never officially adjourns. Even when they’re on vacation, a few legislators will come in every few days to hold a 30 second pro forma session to prevent recess appointments or pocket vetoes. It also gets around a clause in the Constitution, “that neither chamber can adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the other.” The House will be damned if they have to ask the Senate for permission to go home, and vice versa.
Boy the US government is built on a foundation of wildly stupid loopholes
I was about to say. I knew it was stupid but I think I underestimated how.
Unfortunately. The US legal system covers only what's illegal; not what's legal.
Congress will just not stay in session to avoid offending him
Watch Mike Johnson adjourn Congress to stop this.
That’s an mj move 100%
Thank you; been a while since I had to think about that one and oddly enough Lemmy is loading better than Google out here on vacation.
Pocket veto only applies when Congress is in recess I believe.
My predictions
On point one I'm fully expecting a much bigger showing for Democrats due to dummymandering. Red voters are gonna stay home for midterms
Just goes to show, nothing is more important to Republicans than staying in power by any means necessary. They don't give a shit about you, they only give a shit about themselves.
How did you get a camera into Stephen Miller's bathroom?
Such a sexual matador!
He is quite fond of black bulls.
a fit of pique
I don't think I've ever seen those words in that order.
Bitchtits whining again? Oh yep, today ends in a Y.
This fucker is not going to allow elections in 2028. Buckle up, boys.
He can try, but elections are a state level thing that he can't stop. If red states want to abstain, more power to them, but there will be lawsuits, and the citizens will win. Maybe some hopium in there, but most of this stuff is pretty clear cut, and there have been a lot of judges siding against Trump recently, so there's strong precedent.
Also, god willing, he will be fucking dead by then.
This is wildly naive. It's unlikely to be Trump's plan. It'll be plans made by the billionaire puppeteers of this administration. The ones who bought Dominion and the other major electronic voting machine companies. Prepare for a multipronged offensive by billionaires making all or nothing bets.
My response was only directed and the comment I responded too. I did not include the other factors like fucking with the machines or voter suppression, very real concerns. It was only about Trump blocking an election.
I do agree with your assessment on the matter though.
Yep. This is why Trump is dicking with the post office, which is federal.
Also, if only red states abstain from the elections, then only their representatives and senators will be bogged down in lawsuits. Not a great way to retain control of the chambers.
So far.
Also, I hope you’re right.
I thought he did this because he was mad about the senate passing the restrictions on his attacking of iran.
Is this disinformation or was the other thing.
An hour before? He shit his pants again didn't he
Yeah, but that jackass Mikey Johnson won’t hold the vote to override Der Führer.
A veto proof majority is also good enough to pass a discharge petition.
Fortunately, he doesn't have to in this case. 10 days from the deadline it's a law if nothing happens.
Except Johnson has to provide the bill to the president for that clock to start. If he holds onto it, it sits in limbo.
That's not true. Once the bill is passed by both chambers, enrollment is handled by the clerk of the house and secretary of the Senate. Johnson has no power over their actions and can't block anything since it's now past his control. Now, that's not say say he couldn't try to convince them with the no power he has to hold it up, but I don't know who the clerk or secretary are, if they would capitulate, or what the ramifications could be if they declined to do their duties.
“I’ve got a house, a very nice house, it’s painted white, people say it’s very nice to me all the time…”
Demented Rapist Demands Election Fuckery
~~Update: the housing bill only covers homes under $100,000 (Sec. 105). That's why it doesn't matter if it were signed or not.~~
The bill maintains the language in the House amendment restricting institutional investors from buying single-family homes
Restricts the purchase of new single-family homes by large institutional investors that directly or indirectly own at least 350 single-family homes.
Sounds like this part could be a big deal, though.
True. It's not all bad. But I can see why it got bipartisan support now.
That is only one of many different sections. And it is just a pilot program for loans.