this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
395 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30175 readers
2701 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) says New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is going to have to smooth things over with congressional Democrats after backing several progressive candidates who ousted incumbents during Tuesday’s primary elections.

Asked if Mamdani’s endorsements were making him “enemies” with Democrats in Washington, D.C., Jeffries told CNN that he and Mamdani “strongly” disagreed over his primary picks ahead of Election Day.

Now, according to Jeffries, the mayor has serious “work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 4 minutes ago

Ah yes the house Democrats known for their fervor, backbone and hard fought results.

You can't even threaten an enemy properly and you are gonna threaten a fellow Democrat? Fuckin traitors. And they would be dealt with accordingly.

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Offices – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries https://share.google/xfVTRkNSzUw8irrPN

Call his stupid ass. Email his dumbass. Don't be quiet about this.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 minute ago

Don't know if intentional but here's the actual link for people not wanting to click a random Google link

https://jeffries.house.gov/contact/offices/

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 hours ago

Maybe it's Jeffries who has some serious work to do in terms of the conversations that he's going to have with American voters moving forwards.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Of course he reacts like that he’s Israel’s bitch.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 29 points 6 hours ago

Oh how fucking adorable that Jeffries thinks Mamdani answers to him.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh where's that big tent at guys?

Well, its right here in my pants after seeing those awesome primary results.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

This "top democrat" should be ousted too.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Jefferies should shut the fuck. Fall in line, or be made irrelevant.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

He's falling in line with the old guard.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 30 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I just wrote letters to both Jeffries and Schumer telling both of them to throw their full support behind the candidates who won or resign

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 5 points 4 hours ago

Most likely, it won't do much; a drop in a bucket.

But enough drops can fill a bucket, and enough letters can at least bog down their mail handlers, send a message and hopefully get on their nerves.

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 hours ago

Fuck any congressional Democrats that are upset they are getting ousted for progressive candidates...you work for us not them

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Man don't do my man Lurch like that. Clearly Jeffries is a fishman from Innsmouth.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 19 minutes ago

Don’t insult the Deep Ones like that. Jeffries is like the toilet paper stuck to your shoe as you walk out of the bathroom.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 288 points 14 hours ago (15 children)
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

She's the new Mr rogers or for us east Tennessee folk... Dolly Parton.

If you stand against Mrs Rachel... You're wrong.

Imho

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

People against Ms Rachel are akin to that time Mr Rogers had to sue the KKK for impersonating him to spread their hate filled message.

Or when Fox News slandered him. At least the KKK was smart enough (barf) to try to imitate his style for evil. Fox is too dumb even for that.

When you attack the helpers, you're bad.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 14 hours ago

This may be the best gif ever made

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 28 points 12 hours ago

This gif is gonna get a lot of use over the next few years I can feel it.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

With my crystal ball, I predict that this gif is gonna become the hottest commodity in the world roughly twice every two years in May and November for a while.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 47 minutes ago

Don't forget about states with off year elections! Virginia legislature and governor elections are on odd years, and I'm sure we're not alone. Every year is an election year!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 184 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

DNC leadership is pathetic. They have the most popular political leader in the country standing right alongside them and they can't even support the guy, all because they lack the spine to tell their Israeli paylords to suck nut. Fucking corpo leech cowards.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 85 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They're not cowards. They know exactly what they're doing. Mamdani doesn't play ball with their established process. He is a threat to their paychecks and control. Mamdani just indicated to all of them "You might be the next one to lose your job if I decide I want someone else in your district".

They are not cowards. They are strategists prioritizing their own wants above that of the voters and human decency

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 42 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

They are strategists prioritizing their own wants above that of the voters and human decency

Right, that's what we said. Cowards.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 29 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck off with that, DINO

Mamdani for president!

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I’d argue that Jeffries is the exact opposite of a DINO. He’s literally the minority leader. He is exactly what establishment democrats want. And that is the problem. He’s not a DINO, because he’s literally the face of the party. Democrats are simply too far right. And Mamdani is doing his best to drag the Overton window back to the left, even with the establishment democrats kicking and screaming.

But also, Mamdani wasn’t born in the US, and is therefore unable to run for president. Nor could he be in any seat that is in the chain of succession for the spot of POTUS. So for instance, he couldn’t be VP, the speaker, any of the presidential cabinet members, etc… Because all of those are potential future presidents, so allowing him to be in one of those spots would cause a constitutional crisis if he is the only one remaining and is ineligible.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

I don't think the rules of succession state he can't be speaker of the house. If it came to it he would be skipped over for the next in line

[–] Tolos@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Gosh, wouldn't want a constitutional crisis.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

According to The Constitution we should have been having a Constitutional Convention every few years (3 years? 4? 5? 6? Who knows) so maybe we should make up for lost time.

[–] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

He was not born in the US so he is not allowed to run for president

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

We have a rapist in office, who is almost certainly a Russian asset. Why should the rules selectively apply to Mamdani?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's not the bar. You have to be a natural US citizen. You can be born outside of the US with US parents and you would be a natural citizen. Ted Cruz was allowed to run despite being born in Canada because his parents were US citizens. It's just one of the many reasons the whole Obama birth certificate thing was stupid. Even if he was born in Kenya he still would have been eligible because is mom is a US citizen.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 minute ago

Why is this getting upvoted like it's up for debate?

Mamdani is not eligible to run for president. That's just fact.

It's not the same situation as Cruz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 8 hours ago

“work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward.”

Hilarious that he's so worked up about a fucking mayor..... Like what is Congress going to do to a mayor if he doesn't want to talk to congressional members?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago

Welcome to actual democracy, fuck face. Jeffries is an embarrassment. You want your shitty candidates to win? Put up better candidates. Mamdani isn't a congressional rep. He can do whatever the fuck he wants and Jefferies can cry about it to Israel, his true ally.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 91 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

he has to apologize for being aligned with what voters want? isn't that, as political scientists call it, the whole fucking point of democracy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago

Is Jeffries getting whitening therapy or has he just been dead long enough for that pastiness to set in?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 8 points 9 hours ago

Oh no how unfortunate.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 71 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Jeffries, he is not a "top Democrat" he's been a lame duck for all but two weeks of this term because neoliberals lost the DNC and the accompanying victory fund right after his leadership election.

He has no political power in congress, and no one from his own party has reason to listen to him.

He might as well be an empty chair, but he definitely ain't winning a House leadership position again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 43 points 13 hours ago

How about Dem leadership has some "serious work to do" to smooth things over with New York voters for failing to represent them?

load more comments
view more: next ›