this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
654 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

9333 readers
3028 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bro really said "let's do the WORST FREUDIAN SLIP I COULD EVER DO"

EDIT: Here's a video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLfPErx25UM

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago)

Puta merda. Him, Kash, and Rubio are the ultimate definitions of fuck-you-got-mine, given their surnames, and now that they're in positions of privilege they get to shit on anyone they don't like.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 44 minutes ago

What he was trying to say was, "Shut up about the Epstein files and we'll negotiate on the budget."

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

POS brainless twit.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 32 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

When such stupid people can topple an entire nation it really says alot about that nation and its citizens

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 14 hours ago

I've been watching early 2000s crime dramas, and frankly, seeing the best on offer in the US admin, I can't even imagine there are competent people inside any organization anymore. I feel the writers guild has really polished the balls of people in power, when I'm really seeing a lot of bumbling oafs in charge of stuff, not heroes or anyone willing to actually solve anything.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 133 points 23 hours ago

You heard him. He meant what he said.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 91 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome to the United States of Pedophilia

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Oh. Uh. I was just heading out, actually.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 39 points 21 hours ago

"LEAVE DONNY ALONE!" - Ted Cruz while sobbing uncontrollably.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 65 points 23 hours ago
[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago

When people tell you how they are, believe them.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago

Saying the quiet parts loudly. The conservative way.

[–] PrimeErective@startrek.website 29 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 38 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Since when did I need an account to look at Bluesky? I didn't get a Twitter, I'm not getting a bluesky.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Since when did I need an account to look at Bluesky

I think Bluesky gives you options to limit visibility & replyability of your post

[–] molten@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Catbox never loads for me, either.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago

Damn he actually straight up says we need to stop attacking pedophiles

[–] jve@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] molten@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Sorry. Was lazy.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I can download with Firefox and view with VLC . It's probably the second one that is key.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

The .ts file extension probably screwed it up, but it is still amusing.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Nothing to be sorry about! I think everyone blames bluesky. I'm mostly surprised really.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

2/3 ain’t bad.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 12 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

What could he possibly mean?!

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The context is:

"We should have bipartisan agreement."

"How about we all come together and say 'Let's stop murders.'"

"How about we all come together and say 'Let's stop rapes.'"

"How about we all come together and say 'Let's stop attacking pedophiles.'"

Then he shows a chart that supposedly shows the rate of various crimes fell while the national guard was in town. Based on how he phrased things, he probably meant to name another crime. Like, maybe "Let's stop pedophiles attacking children" or something like that. But man, this definitely isn't a slip where the other thing someone probably meant to say is obvious. And, he didn't correct himself, so there's no way to know what he actually meant to say.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

There's "Freudian slip," and then there's "Freudian 32.5 Ft. Water Slide and 2 Inflatable Boards, Extra Long Double Lawn Heavy Duty Splash Mat Pad with Sprinkler for Kids Adults Backyard Summer Water Toy"

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He wrote that shit down and read it. He consciously looked at it, said "yep" and then said it aloud. There was no filter in his mind that what was going out into the world was absolutely heinous and deplorable. That says more to me than any Freudian slip.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago

He (or one of his staffers) wrote something down, and thought he read what was written. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. But, you can't convince me it wasn't a slip.

Let's say he is a pedophile, or he wants to support people who are. Why would he be the one to lead the charge? Has he ever struck anybody as being brave, or as willing to lead from the front? Why would he do it at this time, and do it in such a strange way?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Either he's a pedophile or the people pulling his strings are. Either way, the outcome is the same, the GOP is a party that protects (and has tons of) pedophiles.

We always known this (look at how they try to lower the age of consent/marriage), but now they're not really keeping the mask up. Gonna be interesting to see how many red hats heel turn to saying pedophelia is ok because Daddy trump said so.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They've always thought it was okay. Red States are hotbeds of teen pregnancy, and we all know how pregnancies happen.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The rate of teen pregnancy is a non sequitur in this conversation, unless you're suggesting that teens don't get other teens pregnant. Age requirements for marriage/consent are a better indicator, since outside of Romeo and Juliet statues, that's relevant to the conversation at hand.

The MAGAt politicians ran on an anti-pedo line that got the base (and the Qultists) all hot and bothered last election, and it seems to be one of the things the base was pushing back on. Will be interesting to see how this plays out, whether the base finally turns on the Supreme Casino Bankrupter or if they decide diddling kids is ok when their team does it. Which is the most likely, considering the long history of pedo and sex pest politicians in the GOP.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

That is my question exactly. He obviously wouldn't admit to this, though I'm sure it's his actual feeling on the matter

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I never thought I'd say it, but Ted Cruz is right.

Won't somebody please think of the pedophiles?

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

For those that never act on it, I hope they get psychiatric help. For those that have, jail and help. I have no clue how such a sickness can be helped though (I am against death penalties and sexual mutilation, so no.) But protecting them? Ignoring them? Helllllll no.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah, there's definitely a difference between a person being attracted to children and a person raping children/consuming CSAM.

The first group deserves help to make sure they don't become the second group, and the second group deserves prison.

Especially considering that it's definitely not uncommon for the first group to have been victims of the second.

[–] Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago

Get me out of this fucking state holly shit.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago

Fucking spineless moron.