this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31093 readers
1953 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/48957673

More than half of the children with deportation orders are representing themselves in immigration courts, according to data from the Department of Justice.

President Donald Trump’s massive immigration crackdown has made headlines for what many view as Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s aggressive tactics and alleged inhumane conditions at detention centers.

But what is less talked about are the hundreds of thousands of children navigating the immigration court system as they face deportation.

Of the 751,861 children with pending removal cases, 57 percent, or 425,093 of them, do not have lawyers, Drop Site News reported Friday.

The independent investigative news site’s figures were sourced from an analysis of data from the DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review conducted by the Vera Institute of Justice.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

The number should be 0.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago
[–] BandDad@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And people wonder why I don't feel like celebrating July 4th.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

The way I see it, it's a celebration of what could be, not just what is. It's celebrating a people who saw the injustices their nation was committing and they led a revolution against them, despite the odds being against them. The American Right tries to have ownership of it as a nationalist day, but it is explicitly a celebration of revolution.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Don't get how that's legal, but America never fails to disappoint when it comes to child abuse

[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

The administration decided that “people” means “citizens” only.

I wish I was being sarcastic but I am not.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its legal because the system suborns it

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It’s legal because that’s why.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 2 months ago

nor the GOP when it comes to the lawless abuse of the the power they wield over vulnerable minorities

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I need people to understand that “immigration courts” are not judicial mechanisms. They are administrative courts. In such courts, respondents are not entitled to the same constitutional protections afforded everyone by the judicial system.

This is fucking bullshit. Administrative courts should only exist to adjudicate administrative matters, like rules promulgated by the EPA or FTC. They are not sufficient in their oversight or transparency to address matters concerning individuals and matters addressing specific individuals.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 13 points 2 months ago

More than half of the children with deportation orders are representing themselves in immigration courts, according to data from the Department of Justice.

President Donald Trump’s massive immigration crackdown has made headlines for what many view as Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s aggressive tactics and alleged inhumane conditions at detention centers.

But what is less talked about are the hundreds of thousands of children navigating the immigration court system as they face deportation.

Of the 751,861 children with pending removal cases, 57 percent, or 425,093 of them, do not have lawyers, Drop Site News reported Friday.

The independent investigative news site’s figures were sourced from an analysis of data from the DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review conducted by the Vera Institute of Justice.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

"representing themselves" = "caught helpless and unaided in the cogs of a heartless system"