this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
252 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30350 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Over 80 percent of this spending went toward Republicans or conservative causes, a new analysis finds.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

That is all? That sounds low.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

American politicians are quite cheap.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I wouldn't be surprised if it was 1.6bill each.

Or 1.6bill a month.

[–] mongooseofrevenge@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

"Americans for Tax Fairness Action Fund reveals in a new report Thursday that 40 billionaires and billionaire families with ties to Epstein have injected over $1.57 billion into U.S. elections since 2010.

According to the group’s analysis, 84 percent of this spending, or over $1.3 billion, went toward Republicans or conservative causes."

That's about $3 million a year if divided evenly, mostly to Republicans. I remember seeing articles about politicians being bought for $10-30k. So that's a good stake in the Republican party in every state. And that's only the money they have tracked.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The Republicans who love go fuck children is enjoying support from the Epstein class. Not really shocked about this development.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So that's where most of Trump's 1.76 billion slush fund for traitors came from: additional pedophiles.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Just to be clear: The fund has been (for now, stay tuned) abandoned, but it was always going to come from taxpayers, which rarely if ever means the Epstein class.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

That's just what they could find. And, doesn't include insider trading tips, or other "perks".

The real number is much, much higher, I have no doubt.

One more reason to support term limits for Congress. Don't let them get entrenched. It's not about age, it's about terms. The problem is how long they stay in office, how old they are is just a by-product of that.

We need term limits for Congress.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 hours ago

US politicians are cheaper than you might think.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Does America even have an elections agency anymore? Like, there won't be any problems with campaign donations of you're not going to have elections anymore.

Without elections America will officially be an Authoritarian state.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

We will have elections. Whether they're free and fair is up for grabs.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You have to wonder about correlation and causation here. Are the billionaires spending money on these elections because of their Epstein ties? Or is it just that every fucking one of these billionaire perverts is in the fucking files?

[–] o0evillusion0o@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago