this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12169 readers
335 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Carney caved and is splitting the tolls with the USA.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No that’s not what happened.

Carney conceded 50% of net profits because that gives the baby his candy. But net profits is calculated after paying back the construction debt and interest which is wholly owned by Canada. In addition, there’s some sort of economic development fund that’s jointly contributed to by the Canada and US, not a bad idea I guess. The big concession was giving the US veto power over toll changes for the bridge.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what was originally negotiated. Trump demanded the split immediately. Carney caved to open the bridge.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Originally, Canada was to receive all profits and have complete power over toll prices until we recouped all our costs. At that point it would be 50/50.

The new deal is fine. I don’t know what the “caving in” narrative is about.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The USA is collecting $3b because Trump stongarmed Canada.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How?

The ambassador bridge makes like $100M a year in revenue. The cost of the new bridge was $6.4B once you tack on interest there will be hardly any net profits left to split.

I’m sorry, but this argument makes no sense.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We both know the original deal was Canada was to receive all the toll money until the costs ($6.4B) was recouped. Now the USA receives half the tolls, or effectively $3.2B for contributing nothing. Those are just the facts. You can say it doesn't matter, but it's still $3.2B because of a shakedown, not a negotiation.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok so here’s the problem. In the politest way possible, you don’t understand the new deal.

Canada owns the 6.4B in costs to construct the bridge. This includes the debt and interest.

Canada WILL RECOUP ALL COSTS TO CONSTRUCT THE BRIDGE. DEBT WILL BE PAID OUT. YOU HAVE TO PAY THE DEBT AND INTEREST IN ORDER TO GET NET PROFITS.

After the debt is paid you get net profits. These net profits will now be split 50/50. Previously, Canada was to receive all of the net profits in an effort for Canada to recoup the costs of construction faster. Then the split would be 50/50.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope. Tolls are split immediately.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what's up with that guy. The new deal is fine, sure it was better before as it was pretty clear we keep everything but splitting half the PROFIT is alright. Also there is no word about preventing the toll to be lower than other bridge. They just can't see past their hate for Carney I suppose.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The frustrating part is the misinformation. If you hate him, go ahead and hate him. We can’t be so blinded by hate that we can’t acknowledge a decent idea.

I hate Trump. These newborn savings accounts are a good idea. Trump still sucks dick.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

First line. USA Canada to split profits. If the deal is so good, why won't Carney release the full details?

The operating costs on a brand new bridge would be next to nil.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What about the payment of debt you dunce.

At best you’re willfully ignorant and have poor reading comprehension.

At worst you’re trolling and spreading misinformation.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If by debt you mean the cost of construction, that is now off the table. Profits (money left after operating costs) is split between USA and Canada. This is pretty much common knowledge by now.

At least we don't have to rename it the Donald J Trump bridge.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you’re 100% wrong. We’re splitting net profits which is calculated after the payment of interest and debt.

Grow up and educate yourself

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was really hard to find. Had to do some assumptions myself. If the deal is $4.6B at a 50 yr amortization at 3% interest the combined principle / interest payment per month would be about $15M a month. No story makes it explicit, but if we assume this is taken out prior to calculating net profit, this is the number.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Note to self as a Canadian: Never trust the USA.

I think going forward we avoid any partnership type deal like this. The US can't be trusted to uphold their end of the deal - or anything else for that matter.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It depends on which way the wind is blowing on that particular day, as to whether it'll happen or not.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, this time it is happening, because Carney folded to US demands. Again.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2026/07/10/gordie-howe-bridge-will-open-soon-gop-senate-hopeful-mike-rogers/90880995007/

The U.S. government would receive 50% of the bridge's toll revenue and be able to veto any toll increase that is 10% over the current tolls, according to Reuters. Commercial shippers that sign up for the Gordie Howe Bridge's "Breakaway" discount toll program will pay charges of 6.90 U.S. dollars per axle, according to rates that the new bridge's operators announced in March.

Fuck this spineless worm. The Canadian branch of Starmer Enterprises.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 0 points 1 week ago

This article is wrong about the deal parameters. Strange

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

The smart thing to be doing is going nowhere near the states under any circumstances until there is a change and peops won’t be getting sent to Alligator Auschwitz death camps to fill their coffers. For me, it’s too late. I will never go there ever again.

[–] mister_newbie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Cool. Another thing to look at while I don't visit the Yanks.

[–] EatYourOrach@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I'm understanding this correctly, we paid the full cost to build GH, and now the USA gets half the income AND we're not allowed to charge less than the Ambassador (only 2 months ago, the plan was tolls would be half the price).

Has the billionaire Moroun family finally been appeased?

High school history books should have a chapter about this filthy saga. Land of the freeloaders: The battle for a new cross-border bridge (2015)

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

No the US gets half the Net Profits which is calculated after the construction costs and debt are paid. For the first few years the net profits will be essentially nothing.

We’re still allowed to set the toll prices but and toll change of 10%+ requires US approval.

The new deal is fine