this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
679 points (97.1% liked)

politics

31093 readers
2213 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 133 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No fucking shit, everyone knows this, even the democrats know this, most of them are just bought and paid for

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember having mad respect for Biden for announcing his intention before 2020 of being a one term president.

It sickens me how much the Democrats dropped the ball.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 21 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Biden doesn't get enough hate. If he had allowed real primaries, the Democratic candidate would have won easily. Trump won again because right wing Democrats fight harder against progressive Democrats than they do against Republicans.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 11 months ago

That's assuming the Democrats would even allow fair primaries. That shit has been rigged since forever.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 99 points 11 months ago (19 children)

US Democrats are very conservative under their thin coat of identity politics. They would be considered way to the right of most European conservative parties.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 11 months ago

They're even shedding that after loosing in 2024. Slowly was doing it during the election but then once lost immediately threw trans people and minorities under the bus for the dems incompetence

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 79 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Bill Clinton tried triangulation (read: being more right wing) and the republicans tried to impeach him. Obama was right of Reagan and the republicans…tried to impeach him. If the GOP is going to fuck with democrats no matter what, let’s just elect some truly revolutionary people. I mean people who make Bernie Sanders look like Mitt Romney. People who make Cornel West look like Paul Ryan. We should be running people who start at “if your net worth is over $100 million you get to line up against the wall” and need to be negotiated down from there.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly. The next president should be very progressive - free health care for all, expand public services, get the 800 billionaires, millionaires and corporations to start paying taxes, increase teachers salary and minimum wage, make associate degrees free, no more bailing out industries/companies, get rid of monopolies, make paid pto mandatory of minimal 3 weeks. Call it project 2029 and create the manual for it now so that it’s actualized on day 1. I can dream can’t I? Maybe in 40 years this will be possible….

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

I voted for Obama in 2008 for exactly this reason, that was his platform. Then I watched from my hospital bed in 2010 (partial colonectomy due to diverticulitis) while they (the House and Senate) voted it down. I don't know if he/they was/were corrupted by pharma money after the fact, or if he/they ever intended to follow through to begin with.

In the book Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber, he quotes Obama where he makes the excuse that having Medicare for All would leave 3 million insurance workers out of a job. That would be like stifling the proliferation of electric lighting because of the impact it would have on the whaling industry.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Amen! I want Democrats to do all the things that Republicans accuse them of doing. I want them to do this because being reasonable is not winning brownie points with these people. The next president should tell America to get ready for a new national flag; we're adding 3 more stars for Puerto Rico, Guam, and Washington DC!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago (11 children)

They aren’t moderate they are where the far right was in 2000

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Moderates? Maybe 30 years ago. As they shift the Overton window they stay in lockstep with Republicans as they shift to the right, filling the void left by Republicans. Policy wise they sit somewhere between GW Bush and first term Trump

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 9 points 11 months ago

Well things change, I guess supporting genocide is moderate these days.

[–] dissentiate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"Modest"?

No, we have better language to use

Useless

Disingenuous

Paid actors

Servants to the ruling class

Inside traders

Purposefully weak

Blatantly dishonest

And the list could go on and on...

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago

Controlled opposition.

[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Democrats now are where Republicans were in the 80s

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is correct. They've "moderated" their views so many times over the years that they are only distinguishable from Reagan Republicans because of their stance on abortion.

And people are even calling for Dems to be more "pro-life" in order to further appeal to "moderates." It's absurd.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

There's no such thing as meeting Nazis in the middle. That's called "becoming a Nazi".

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

In the UK, our politics are currently similar. Our centre-left party is Labour, who are in government, but they're losing popularity. Keir Starmer, the leader of Labour, has made Labour more moderate. They've lost some voters to the Reform party (populist right) but they've lost even more voters to parties that are left of Labour (Lib Dems and Greens).

There's a left-wing Labour politician called Andy Burnham who has criticised Labour's direction, and he said something which I think can apply to the US too:

If I look at the world right now, and you think of the populist right, whatever we may think about what they’re doing, they are putting big things on the table... Well, we have to do the same the other way, never pandering to them, but put big ideas on the table.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 24 points 11 months ago

I don't view Democrat leadership as moderate at all. "Centrist", just means Republican policies that boil the frog.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tell that to the NYT.

"Clever people say that once you become exactly like your opponent you will win elections!"

And even that wouldn't work because this opponent would likely just move further right. Not sure there's anywhere to go anymore, but they'd try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That’s why it isn’t working.

We don’t want moderates. Moderates aren’t the ones that will get Civil Rights, campaign reform, rein in monopolies, get rid of Citizens United, health care for all, etc. Moderates just half-ass “solutions” that keep stuffing more money in the already wealthy’s pockets while ineffectively trying to get bakeries to make wedding cakes for gay couples. We need actual liberals and progressives, not Republican-lite.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

Democrats and Republicans are two halves of the one party state in America

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Democrats Are Already “Moderate.”

I'd say quite a few of them are conservative bordering on reactionary. You just can't see it for all the MSNBC talking heads that insist Henry Cuellar is the far left of the political spectrum and anyone beyond that is a Tankie posting from a North Korean IP address.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

The whole moderate thing was an attempt to appeal to Republican voters. They live in a personality cult echo chamber now, it would serve no purpose except catering to ghost. The fact that they are still thinking within a system that has been fundamentally corrupted is why they are doomed to failure.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There are only two parties in that stupid place, what the hell would they think being diet right would do?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Make them money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago

Well, democracts mostly act like the other side of the coin of republican. And it's not hard to understand why when you see PACs and millionaires funding both.

load more comments
view more: next ›