this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
199 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 68 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A+ strategy. His estate can claim he was straight by agreeing trans women are women.

[–] homes@piefed.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ha!

Magnificent

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Most of you know him as the homophobic Senator from South Carolina but to me he will always be the man who paid a twinky pre-transition college student a fat stack of cash to do unspeakable things to him in a hotel room while he wore red lingerie,” the Sorry I Keep Crying During Sex author wrote in the three-slide post, accompanied by a hand raising emoji. “It is a canon trans event to have far right freaks bankrolling you & then turning around and voting against you.”

[–] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fucking speak up then when it happens. Christ that's infuriating

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago

Speak up and then what? Sex workers had already been talking about Lyndsey Graham for a long time.

It’s not her fault that Lyndsey Graham was a hypocrite, it’s not her responsibility to speak up about it.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 11 points 2 months ago

She continues to say that she didn’t know he was a politician at the time

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (3 children)

“At the time I had no idea who he was, and I only figured it out because another group or twinks leaked Lady G to the media,” Rose continued. “Some queer tried to grandstand critique this, saying we shouldn’t ‘out’ people. I believe bigots with power deserve no peace or privacy, especially when they hold public office. I’m glad they did it. Icons forever.”

There's at least one blahaj account running around trying to defend Graham...

They really need to read this article and maybe they'd finally figure out not everyone LGBTQ is an ally and not all allies are LGBTQ.

It's fucking wild to defend Lady G just because they were closeted LGBTQ.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How are there people who don't know who he is? He was in politics on the national stage for decades.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

There are probably a lot of representatives I wouldn't recognize, even if I know their name and deal.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Agreed. Public politicians who advocate death and pain don’t deserve the quarter they denied others. His hypocrisy wasn’t his own. He forced it on his whole state, nation, and even other countries. Bigotry aside, he would have kept sex workers from being safe with his policies.

Honestly, should’ve happened sooner.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Plenty of Jewish people worked on the Nazis side.