this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
271 points (98.2% liked)

politics

30600 readers
2047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US House voted Tuesday to pass a measure to enact year-round Daylight Saving Time across the country, springing Congress forward into an issue that has long stumped lawmakers and spurred impassioned pleas by parents, farmers and others with sharply divergent views.

It will now head to the Senate for approval before going to the president for his signature — though its chances in the upper chamber remain unclear.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If we see Donald Trump give that big speech on Thursday in a sweater I will think we fell into the time vortex

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

He’s not cool enough to put solar panels on the White House or give up his family business.

Or have a cool brother who makes beer.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Can we please go metric next? I'm old but an engineer (and a farmer) metric makes things so much easier...

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

It would be nice. I would love to not have to keep two sets of each tool type just because America can't admit Europe did something better. And not just a little better, like, it's embarrassing how difficult SAE is over metric.

It's probably too late for me. But I dream of a world where my grandchildren only need one socket wrench set.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you do enough stuff yourself you already have two sets of tools. And torx bits. And triple squares. And reverse Torx and triple square. And robertsons. And Allen bits.

And extended versions of all of those. And short versions. And impact versions and the good ones and the garbage ones and sometimes extractor versions if you had a real bad day and went to Harbor Freight three times.

But never a ten mill when you need one.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 2 weeks ago

Australian here.

It's been a long time since I encountered a nut or bolt that was unambiguously imperial, but my 13mm socket probably gets more use than it should 😏

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

A distraction it may be, but I'll take a win where I can get one. Idgaf which version of the clock we're going with, I just want it to be consistent

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 34 points 2 weeks ago

I don't care which one they lock in, as long as they just fucking pick one and stick to it. It's the changing that's the problem - we all have electric lights ffs.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is good ... but the same kind of good like the captain of the Titanic declaring that the kitchens must supply vegetarian meal options to those who request it.

Yes, a good thing, but really far off from the most urgent issues facing the country, isn't it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m super into this. I’ve been dying for permanent DST for a long time and I really thought they were going to push Standard Time instead.

[–] dejova281@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Permanent DST is more popular as most are evening people

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yeah but I like my evenings dark. Do you know how hard it is to get a 6 year old kid to agree that it’s bedtime when the sun’s still up? They’re not stupid, dad!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Exactly, the significant majority of people hate the sun going down extra early in winter. The winter is so depressing with so much darkness, we especially need to maximize how much sunlight see in winter

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly having darkness until 8 or 9 in the morning would be great for sleeping in during Christmas break.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

But the bill is just gonna die in the Senate, so don't hold your breath

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

maybe in a twist of irony instead of the bill dying in the Senate, the Senate will die instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The mistake was calling it the sunshine protection act, that sounds too much like an environmental bill for them to pass it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe, but originally it was the Senate who passed it sixish years ago and it died in the House.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago

They'll fuck it up and pick the wrong time, and it will be dark at 4:30 PM for the rest of our lives.

In 50 years, they'll try to switch to the other time, but Conservatives will fight it because they think they'll lose two hours, and they'll literally threaten a Civil War over two hours, then someone will try to explain that they'll actually GAIN two hours, and they'll say it's a Communist hoax with their two Socialist hours, just handing them out to people who don't deserve them, like the welfare queens just helping themselves to as many hours as the Demon-rats can steal from the billionaires who have more hours than everybody else combined.

So they'll compromise, and go back to switching times twice a year to keep NOBODY happy, and America can go back to normal.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Watch Trump veto it because he didn't get his election rigging "SAVE" act passed.

[–] homes@piefed.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Doesn’t the rest of the world observe standard time? Why would we be permanently out of step with the rest of the world?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Actually, all "standard" time means is that the time is somewhat related to the sun being directly overhead at noon. I say "somewhat" because once you carve the world up into zones like that, the sun will never be directly overhead at noon except maybe in the middle of the zone.

Did you know China has only one time zone? The entire huge country runs on Beijing time. The far west of the country sometimes doesn't see a sunrise until 10 AM.

So, there is really nothing "standard" about Standard Time at all.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would like to see the world finally move to Swatch Internet Time and resolve all this silliness once and for all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I literally do not care. Make it permanent either direction for christs sake.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. All being 'out of step' means is that it basically just shifts the time zones one step over. And as long as it just stays that way, it's fine.

[–] TheMadBeagle@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

As someone who works with timezones as a developer it doesnt really matter I don't think. Timezone are already kind of a mess of a concept and honestly I just want it tp stop changing, I don't really care which way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

How close are they to impeaching pedophiles in office?

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm happy to get rid of the change, but once again they ignore scientists and health experts with the choice of daylight time.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Permanant DST was signed into law January 1974 and repealed October 1974. Everyone hated it, it went from 79% approval in December of 1973 to 46% in February of 1974.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why couldn't they do permanent Standard Time? If history of permanent DST legislation prevails, this will be repealed within a year or two. Same as it will be in BC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

I once found a page that would show you what permanent DST or Standard time would look like in your area, but cannot find it now. Anyone know a link to something like that?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] methanemoose@lemmus.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Would be better if it was clear they did any research on the subject. Last time this came around it was clear, standard time was better for us. This now just feels like rich people will keep us poors on DST while they get the clock humans get a better night sleep with and still somehow take our money.

I hate that I can believe something like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In Brazil we made it always standard time (the one good thing bolsonaro did in his life) though I personally would prefer always daylight savings time

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly either way works. The switching is the annoying part.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One of very few things that administration has done right

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›