this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
280 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

11833 readers
1443 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago

Wait until they hear about how town fires are extinguished.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah, it is socialism. Socialism is when the people own the means of production. In a democracy, the people own the government, hence why government services are referred to as "publicly owned".

Any and all problems with this, either present or past, have nothing to do with socialism, and everything to do with a lack of democracy. The well being of the working class is inextricably tied to the amount and quality of democracy in their country.

Every single country they're referencing - Venezuela, USSR, China, North Korea - the problems with these countries aren't because they were socialist or communist. It's because they were dictatorships. Absolute power always corrupts.

And the same dictatorships currently branding themselves as "socialist" don't want western leftists to recognize the fact that Europe is actually doing socialism for the working class, and they try to discredit it by claiming they are only enriching their working class off the backs of the global south. But you can't claim that for countries like Ireland or Finland. They're examples of socialism working, examples of socialism we should follow.

And it's for the exact same reasons the American Republicans don't want you to think of Europe when you think of socialism. Because it threatens hypercapitalism, whether in the form of America, or China.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 23 points 6 hours ago

I love how they think they know what's best for a city that's thousands of miles away that they think is so crime riddled that they'll never visit.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

In Canada, we have provinces with government-run liquor stores and provinces without.

I live in a province with government-run liquor stores and frequently visit two that have privately-run ones. The privately-run ones are typically dingier, have less selection, and the selection they have is lower-quality. So far I have visited only one privately-run liquor store that I actually like. Out of ten.

Yes, that could just be bad luck, but I've only visited one government-run liquor store that felt depressing and where I disliked the selection... Out of dozens.

Draw whatever conclusions make you happy.

[–] Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’m confused. Why does the government have to run the booze shops? I’m Australian and I cannot imagine what need there is for public ownership. Are you talking about very very remote or rural places?

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Why? I don't know. Very very remote or rural places? Not exclusively.

Need? I don't know, but it would seem to avoid the things we've been talking about: race to the bottom with cost cutting, catering primarily to addicts, wide disparity in quality between affluent areas and low-income areas.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

Plus the private ones charge more than the government stores.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Pennsylvania has a similar setup and while other states’ liquor stores can occasionally be nicer, they are on average less nice, especially when the area isn’t as rich.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Indeed. Unsurprisingly, the one privately-run liquor store I have loved is in an upscale (but not wealthy) plaza in un upscale part of the city. It's very clean and has a loooooong fine wines fridge. The rest are underwhelming, frequently dimly-lit, and even difficult to walk around in (very narrow aisles).

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

One is serving addicts, the other connoisseurs

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

There is certainly a feedback loop there.