this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
139 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30499 readers
2284 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the British Broadcasting Company is backfiring in his face, as a judge has greenlit the subpoenaing of his inner circle.

But on Tuesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett said the BBC can proceed with subpoenas for Trump’s closest advisers and confidants—including his family members, Stephen Miller, and Steve Bannon—to make the case on what Trump’s actual goals were on January 6.

Lett also ruled that Trump must hand over hundreds of financial records, as Trump argued in his lawsuit that the episode hurt his many businesses.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago

TACO will back down bigly before discovery. His followers will claim victory.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 53 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Guess Trump thought he could bully the BBC as he did the local stations. The thing he forgot was that the BBC doesn't need his approval for mergers and it's not owned by any of his billionaire buddies.

Can they even drop the trial to avoid discovery at this point? Because some shit is about to come out in that discovery. Also I really hope they depose Trump.

[–] BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world 20 points 1 hour ago

They can just do what Alex Jones did in his defamation trail and refuse to cooperate with discovery. The court can't make them turn over documents at gunpoint, but the court can threaten to tell the jury that one party refused to cooperate, and to assume the evidence would be very bad for the party refusing to turn it over.

It's basically giving the other party carte blanche to say whatever they want because you're admitting you won't back anything up. So the discovery has to be pretty bad for someone to refuse to cooperate.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 9 minutes ago

Its a civil trial and he can drop it at any time

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 26 minutes ago

The problem is that the bullying works even if it isn't really successful.

Next time a producer is considering whether to publish something, they're less likely to say something controversial about little-T because no one wants the bother of a lawsuit with POTUS even if it worked out ok last time.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 23 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes! Finally! Fuck diplomacy with these thugs, give an inch and they take a mile, take away their immunity and charge them for every little crime.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

It's about time all of them get the Pulp Fiction treatment. A nice shot to the balls and let them stay put until the party starts.

I'm just spitballing here.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 hour ago

I'm guessing Trump's involvement in January 6th was far more damaging to his businesses than reporting on it.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 18 points 2 hours ago

This makes me downright giddy...

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

BBC is going to rearrange his guts.