this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
253 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30517 readers
2796 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is EXACTLY what I Voted For!

-Republicans LITERALLY!

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even satire. I was still in the "talking" phase with my MAGA mother when DOGE was happening. You can walk them through each step. They'll agree with you as you show them the evidence. Then still conclude "yeah, but it will make things better to not have government involved".

I will never understand how someone can be so trusting of government as long as it's fucking them over and just saying "less government" at the end.

Shutting down all the libraries and getting rid of firefighters would be "less government".

It's this false idea they have that things are "complicated" and they feel smart coming to the dumbest fucking conclusion that someone else said that doesn't have their class interest. It's how you get dumb people to feel like they are smart while working against their own material interest.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think something is just wrong with some people's brains where they go with in-group solidarity no matter what. Overrides almost any amount of logic and reason

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah. It's kinda depressing when it's family though. I told my mom "you tell me all the time that you're proud of me for graduating, getting a job in software, tell me I'm so smart and how you'd never be able to understand 'computer stuff'. But, all of that means nothing when you let your feelings about Trump be stronger than those for your son. So much so that you advocate for AI and datacenters because they tell you to. When your own son literally has worked in that field for over a decade."

I thought that would get through to her. But the normal response of "agreeing" and then saying "but" at the end. It's exhausting. I've basically gone no contact apart from a video call she gets with her granddaughter. In which I hang up if she talks about anything related to politics.

Edit: I don't work in software anymore. Was fired from Microsoft for working with NOAA (No Azure for Apartheid) over a year ago now. I specifically worked in datacenter hardware and integration of it with Azure and AI. Fuck Microsoft.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

ISPs complained about the burden and complexity of listing all the passthrough fees they had chosen to charge.

If it's so complex that you can't provide accurate pricing for your service, you should streamline your pricing so it's accurate.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago

One more thing made great again! Fees.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

'As long as we mislead consumers and keep a system of cartel regions we will be profitable.' -CEOs everywhere. It's about time some states "nationalize" their utilities. I doubt the USA will ever do it on a national level.