this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
308 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31105 readers
1960 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House voted 216-214 on a budget reconciliation framework that includes $10 billion worth of election-related grants over a 10-year period for coaxing states into adopting anti-voting measures like those in Trump’s pet proposal. The $95 billion package also includes funding for the Iran war and bailouts for farmers hurt by Trump’s tariffs.

It’s still unclear what will be in the final reconciliation bill; now that the budget resolution has been approved, individual House committees will go about drafting the legislation. The reconciliation process allows Senate Republicans to bypass the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold and pass legislation with a simple majority.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 138 points 1 month ago (2 children)

YAY! FASCISM!!!

it's what assholes crave!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Weird, my asshole craves girldick

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So do they. But instead of letting themselves accept that girldick into their lives (it's not even gay if the girl uses her own dick!), they fill their void with fascism.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sounds ~~pretty~~ at least 1/3 gay TBF.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You've gotta understand the cognitive dissonance at play.

If you get fucked by a transfem with long hair, tits, and a dick....that's woman enough for it to not be gay. 2/3 is a majority.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Hmm... I'm not sure I totally agree, but I will edit my comment for sake of argument.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Sir, this is a Wendys

[–] gh0stb4tz@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Welfare for farmers… wait a second, isn’t that socialism?

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 47 points 1 month ago

The reason many conservatives don't like socialism is because the wrong sort of people will get nice things. That's it. If white people benefit then it's cool.

They are bad people by any reasonable metric.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Farmers are often depicted as a profession done by poor people, the reality in the US is that the poor people got bought out decades ago, most farmers are actually gigantic land owners and often millionaires

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No. Socialism would be if the government nationalized Monsanto and then cut checks twice a year to every US citizen distributing the profits.

They're just doing fascism. They're enriching their wealthy buddies and further consolidating entire industries under corporate ownership. They may also be doing what they can to prop up the food industry because they know people will lose their shit if there's nothing to eat.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

No, that's just a simple helping hand. You're just not looking at it in the White way.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

corporate farms

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Government funds to farmers to help with the rising costs and effects of war? This feels like a word that usually isn't associated with capitalism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of the farmland is owned by a handful of oligarchs and mega-corps

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True but I’d wager this is an 11th-hour attempt to buy back heartland wallet voters they’ve been hemorrhaging for over a year. Hopefully they take the bribe and still vote against him.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't be the first time Donald Trump just started handing out checks and hoping for the best.

But it's easy to take someone's money and still hate the guy signing the check. Ask any wage laborer.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

it is when you consider that farms are mega corps these days. they don’t care about a little co-op in Shelbina, MO.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah see, they're just throwing everyday struggling farmers a bone!

Oh wait no, it's not that at all. It's that they know they need to prop this industry up as widespread access to food is probably one of the last things keeping people from revolting

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

They don't have a majority in the Senate for it even if the Senate accepts it as a budget bill, which is not guaranteed.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Where were the fillabuster avoidance strategies when dems were in power FFS. Dems are shit at politics and power.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The House doesn't have a filibuster. It never has. The Senate has the filibuster.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And they’re trying to pass it off as a budget related bill which is immune to filibusters

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I even think the current administration's courts and administrative process of the senate has already kicked back similar bills. They aren't allowed to just slip in anything to budget reconciliation bills.

But I'm not confident it won't go their way, as precedent. Means little

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I even think the current administration’s courts and administrative process of the senate has already kicked back similar bills.

It has. The Senate parliamentarian is an office (currently held by Elizabeth MacDonough) who, among her other responsibilities, decides whether or not bills qualify for the budget reconciliation process under the Byrd rule and are thus immune to the filibuster rule. She has had her work cut out for her lately. With the passage of this in the House, you can expect to hear Trump spouting off again about replacing her.

Fun fact, if it wasn't for the Senate parliamentarian and her staff, Jan-6 could have been a lot worse.

Separate and apart from the nuances of the Byrd rule, it is worth being reminded that it was the Senate parliamentarian and her staff that had the quick sense to remove the Electoral College voting boxes from the marauding Capitol Hill rioters on Jan. 6, 2021. Had it not been for their quick action, the threat to our democracy that day would have been even deeper.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think you’re right though I feel like I remember at least one that they waved through though it wasn’t really qualified

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

dems do it on purpose because reps are just fine with the anger that comes from them being “worse.” because in reality reps and dems are the same: capitalists.

[–] _fryerDan@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

god fucking dammit

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Oh what the fuck

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Kickbacks for red states and their constituents affected by the war.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Republicans are treasonus scum. What's new.