this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
217 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86600 readers
2986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 57 minutes ago

That’s really bad. I feel like some of those cars with only three wheels set a pretty high bar.

[–] deddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It took 68 years but someone finally beat out edsle as the worst automotive failure, I'm just glad it was Elon Muppet.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

reads the wikipedia article

considered overhyped, low quality, and unattractive

double checks to make sure I'm not on the cybertruck article

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 1 points 59 minutes ago

Had someone been hyping you?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 82 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Couldn't happen to an uglier, more stupid car.

It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I would usually give a lot of credit to someone trying something different, but I'd drive a 1971 Ford Pinto before I ever intentionally get within photographable proximity to a Cybertruck.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

And you'd be safer for it.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 19 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

When the cybertruck was first announced, I actually appreciated how different it looked, but its performance and association to Musk has entirely ruined any hope of me ever liking a low-poly vehicle ever again.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 2 hours ago

I dunno, the original Lotus esprit is still pretty cool in my book

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago

I saw a concept car and expected to see a radically different version on the road. As a design study, I thought it had potential.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 hours ago

I thought it would look unique in a geeky way. Instead it looks unique in a Nazi way. That's not my vibe. Killed my enthusiasm for owning something that I knew most people would hate. Also costing twice as much and being a piece of shit.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Indeed.

Still shocking he never hired a designer. Even an idiot fraud like Elizabeth Holmes knew to do that.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That's quite exactly what they were going for actually. Lo-res graphic to represent hi-tech. Somewhat like military camo is now pixelated for no practical reason.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Just because you don't know why digital camouflage exists doesn't mean it has no practical purpose.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Neither pixellation nor digitization contributes to the camouflaging effect. The pixellated style, however, simplifies design and eases printing on fabric, compared to traditional patterns. While digital patterns are becoming widespread, critics maintain that the pixellated look is a question of fashion rather than function.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 15 minutes ago

Simplified design and easier printing sounds like a very practical purpose.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.

It looks like my drawing of a car as a 4 year old brought to reality

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Even worse than the Edsel? Nice!

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Only a time travel movie can save it.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Really? I see chuds driving them all over my town unfortunately. Admittedly far less popular than other Tesla vehicles though which are absolutely everywhere here in CA. Seems like most people forgot Musk is a nazi already.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I see them every so often in Seattle. I always give them a disapproving look and a big thumbs down, I’ve found that pisses people off more than a middle finger.

[–] batdad90@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Those chuds bought early into the idea they would be renting out their trucks at night using self driving and make a profit.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I point and laugh when I see one and say "look at the fucking idiot." They love that.

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago

lol.

lmfao even.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Who would have thought a three year olds drawing of a car would have not resonated with the masses.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

Now if the world were only truly a meritocracy.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How you fuck up making a truck so badly?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah the electric pickup is such a no brainer for the US market and it was one of the first.

But what if it was horribly ugly and made everyone hate you? Surely it will sell even better then!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah the electric pickup is such a no brainer for the US

Disagree. The truck market itself is a no brainer, but electric trucks have design challenges that electric sedans don't. Namely, aerodynamics, towing, and aerodynamics while towing. It is much harder to make an electric truck capable of doing "truck stuff" with a reasonable range and price compared to making an electric car.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Harder maybe but it's clearly doable. We have a number of options now. And it's not like they've had to make them hyper-aerodynamic or anything. Just took a little more advanced battery tech.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I believe Ford has the f150 lightning, an ev version. I don't know how it's been doing though.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

The all electric version has been cancelled in favor of a hybrid design, but they claim the hybrid has a 700 mile range

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/15/nx-s1-5645147/ford-discontinues-all-electric-f-150-lightning

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The design was meant to be controversial and it certainly got a lot of attention when it was first introduced. The reason that thing failed is that its performance was way worse than what was promised while costing a lot more.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

A friend of mine called it the modern Edsel when it first came out

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

From what I understand, it was never supposed to be a truck, it was supposed to be a tax write-off for businesses. That's also why it's stupid ugly and heavy, it has to be 500 or 600 lbs (I forget which) to get the write-off as a truck. The fact that everyone laughs when they see them was unexpected. I think they thought it would be loved by all, especially the businesses.

A new piece from Bloomberg makes the case, comparing the Tesla vehicle to the misfortunes of Ford's Edsel, which was first introduced in 1957 and discontinued just two years later. After spending years building up hype for the car, Ford predicted selling 200,000 units in its first year, but ended up selling less than a third of that.

That's comparable to expectations versus reality of the Cybertruck. In fact, the Cybertruck is actually doing worse in key ways. Tesla's annual sales target was 250,000 units, but it didn't even crack 40,000 sales in its first year. And like the Edsel, it's sold less with each successive year, with barely 7,100 registered in the US in 2026 so far, according to S&P Global Mobility data — despite Musk juicing those figures by selling Cybertrucks to his own companies.

[–] smellhound@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I think you forgot a zero, right?

  • Rear-Wheel Drive (Single Motor): 6,118 lbs (2,775 kg)

  • All-Wheel Drive (Dual Motor): 6,634 to 6,669 lbs (3,009 to 3,025 kg)

  • Cyberbeast (Tri-Motor): 6,863 to 6,898 lbs (3,113 to 3,129 kg)

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

6,000, not 600. 600 would be a very light vehicle indeed. Even the Reliant Robin is about 970. The Smart Fortwo is at least 1,800.

Or it has to have certain offroading features.

https://www.autoblog.com/features/everything-is-an-suv-today-because-of-this-fuel-economy-loophole

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

The IRS gives business tax deductions for vehicles. Under 6000lbs it's $12k, over 6000 is $31k

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Also the rest of the theory is as inaccurate as the weight figure.

[–] AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

More bloodthirsty than the Pinto too.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Cybertruck Is the Biggest Flop

Why does anyone think that is still news?

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Should have included a heads up display