I don't really game anymore after having almost a 40 year run. However, I used to regularly recommend going digital only up to several years ago. Then, store delisting started becoming more common and affecting games I previously played, so I completely gave up consoles and retracted all my recommendations.
Kimika
joined 1 week ago
You should believe in yourself more.
You said you couldn't speak for them, but that's a spot-on impression
I'll speak for that user. They can't observe very well.
I shared with them a 2022 UN report that acknowledges human rights abuses of the Uyghurs and other minority populations (via OHCHR), but I purposely didn't say it was the UN. They then went to say the UN said there was no genocide.
To clarify, you're saying the UN disagrees with the OHCHR assessment...
Edit: Clearly pointless to continue a thread of comments
The UN says there's no genocide of the uyghurs taking place in China.
I'm a little surprised I was able to make you say something so stupid so quickly. The OHCHR Assessment is a UN statement. It concludes the many claims about human rights abuses are supported and there is cause to claim China has committed crimes against humanity. It never discredits genocide, for—as I summarized previously—it avoids addressing the term genocide completely.
I'm newer to the "site", but way to go on making a statement that presumes truth with nothing to back it up. You may be using reverse psychology or be a bot, but for posterity, let's put out some actual info.
If we presume your comment to be sincere, then it would logically follow that you would dismiss all the western nations' legislative declarations that genocide has taken place, and that dismissal would extend to claims made by all the activist organizations.
How about some reports and declarations from international bodies who jump through hoops to avoid commitment? I'll link them below, which you can evaluate on your own. An example of noncommittal can be found in the activist criticism against the OHCHR assessment. The assessment goes in great detail of all the human rights abuses but doesn't mention the word genocide or try to address if it meets the definition. Unsurprisingly, China's retort to the assessment was "Nuh uh we are fighting terrorism" and NK, Cuba, and Venezuela advocated on behalf of China with "Shhh please don't publish"
https://genocidescholars.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Final-IAGS-resolution-Uyghurs.pdf https://www.icij.org/investigations/china-cables/icc-complaint-alleging-uighur-genocide-cites-china-cables-as-evidence/ https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-assessment-human-rights-concerns-xinjiang-uyghur-autonomous-region
I try to avoid watching anything that shows his image or replays his voice, but I've seen Trump be absolutely humiliated at least once. It was the WHCA dinner when Obama roasted him over Trump's birth certificate flop.
It's could very well be the point at which he dedicated himself to raping America and never would be able to stop obsessing over Obama, the man who smirked while he spanked him in public and everyone laughed.
-
Even if not learned through experience, it can also be learned through critical thinking. One could take a moment to ponder why someone is checking the eggs and could easily arrive at the conclusion they're checking for broken ones.
-
Or they could open their mouth without thinking much and say something ignorant to a stranger in the grocery store
-
Or they can demonstrate the greater depths of their ignorance and make a post about it on a social media platform showing they had time to figure it out but couldn't despite it being on their mind the entire time.
Sadly, much of our random interactions and popular public discourse are driven by #2 and #3
I look at AI usage at work as basically taking on a bad but salvageable employee. For every use case, it needs a manager overseeing all their work and adapting to their strengths and weaknesses while also considering cost. It's a deployment problem created by over promising.