this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
59 points (95.4% liked)

politics

30542 readers
2125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 minutes ago

My bad guys, I was always bad with managing ammo in game

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Anybody with a passing interest in modern military could have told you this. You don't want to use an interceptor worth $2m to shoot down a drone that costs tens of thousands, unless it's heading for something vital. Remember too that an interceptor system can't just be purchased in unlimited quantities, so in the short term a fired missile is one less you have for tomorrows threats.

Ukraine and Russia have been doing this math every day for like 5 years.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What an odd way to say "America started a drone war without enough weapons to intercept drones."

Haigseth is basically coming out and admitting that they've blown through the vast majority of our weaponry (in front of Congress, which is hilarious).

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Not like this info should be suppressed, but now I'm guessing Iran will just send more drones without payloads to save on their munitions.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago

‘I let you score that goal’

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I could see Trump and Hegseth letting more service members die to atoke public outrage against Iran in the runup to midterms. It won't work, mind you, but I could see them doing it.

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 hours ago

Independents are more likely to see the deaths as Trumps fault. The legacy of the Iraq war runs deep, Americans do not want to have troops in the middle east.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Wouldnt want your opposition to feel too bad, right?

The fuck is this headline?