this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
102 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

86663 readers
3285 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Artificial intelligence labs are in a new arms race to buy up millions of rare books, slicing them open, scanning the pages and pulping the remains — sparking concerns that the last remaining copies of out-of-print texts are being destroyed on an industrial scale.

ISBNdb notes that “print books from the pre-LLM era are structurally guaranteed to be free of this contamination”.

“Millions of the most valuable books have never been digitised. They exist only in physical form, scattered across library shelves, used bookstores, and out-of-print catalogues. We get them to you at scale.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 minutes ago

Good way to prepare for rewriting history to their liking. Shredding/destroying the books should be illegal in this regard.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 32 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

I really hope the AI bubble pops soon and takes at least some of these stupid companies with it. They've been operating at a GIANT loss for years at this point, how much longer will this go on?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 hours ago

The way I see the situation is that every single AI company can clearly see the massive wall they are speeding ever faster towards, they see it and can also see that it is a massive wall, thick and sturdy.

There is however one thing that keeps them pushing the accelerator down hard against the floor, the delusion that they alone is smart enough to find the prefect weakpoint where they can smash through to the promised land of massive promises, while everyone else is just flattened against the wall.

It is extreme narcissism combined with yes men powering this shit.

Investors are starting to notice that it’s all smoke and mirrors in terms of the profits. I am reasonably sure it will pop this year. I will be utterly shocked if it doesn’t pop by the end of next year. It’s just so comically and obviously unsustainable.

This is gonna go down as the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time, I swear.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno, the GameStop Bros are still waiting for MOASS. So I'd say the wealthy have more ways to keep the plates spinning than we wish they did.

[–] LordFireCrotch@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

I like the plate spinning analogy. I think these guys have SO much money that they do have a few tricks up their sleeve to keep investors going.

I think once they land a few enterprise level fish hard, it will keep the plates spinning a good bit longer.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

“Book burning, you say?”

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago

The bookseller explained that in April, he suddenly went from selling around 20 books per week to hundreds — including obscure and out-of-print works.

“It benefits me financially as well as by clearing out old inventory that is otherwise unlikely to sell,” he said.

I hate the AI slop as much as the next guy, but these are books nobody wanted. They were going to rot on the shelf until being thrown out. Just being rare doesn't mean it's particularly valuable.

Hopefully they are retaining the digitized versions for release at some point in the future. I'd imagine they are, since they'd still need the raw data to train future models.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So they can gatekeep knowledge? Got it.

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

That would imply preserving the original. No, they are having their AIs revise history and its literature to whatever they deem 'acceptable' in their new world order, hence the rampant book banning spree they've been on as of late.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

This sounded like clownish villainy in Rainbows End. I swear these guys are compulsively drawn to the worst parts of SciFi.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Anthropic described the project as “our effort to disruptively scan all the world’s books” in an internal memo, which noted “we do not want it to be known that we are pursuing this project”.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You know what, burn the whole fucking planet down. I'm done with this clown-ass species.

I just dont even know what to say about the intentional destruction of knowledge

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

They're making it really hard to like them.

[–] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I hope when the bubble bursts the cunts making these kinds of decisions are so distraught by their losses they resort to suicide.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I hate that I started to wish for the deaths of people I don't even know outside of news coverage, but that's what it takes unfortunately

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

if this was about Number Go Up, they'd probably make more money selling the despined books or something instead of destroying them and selling (or do whatever they're doing with) the raw pulp. this sounds like an expensive process and there's no guarantee that expanding these datasets is going to improve their models in a quantifiable way, let alone a profitable one. they must just get some kind of perverse pleasure out of making the world a worse place

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I was worried there would be some part of AI that I didn’t like at all . . .

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh, I remember this one. They're Wipers!