this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
196 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30600 readers
2791 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Scrambling? They're just flat out lying on camera and refusing to genuinely release a huge portion of the files or to remove their perpetrator-protecting redactions, even for other law enforcement agencies. They're very clearly and very actively trying to cover it up by simply sitting and doing nothing, we all know it, and we're not bothering to riot in the streets until it changes.

We know the sitting US President raped kids, and we're all just going along with life and paying taxes as normal. If the Emperor of France was outed as a child rapist their entire country would be on fire before lunch time.

The DoJ is doing the total opposite of scrambling. They're just doing nothing. They don't investigate financial crimes, or federal agents dunning random innocent folk down in the street. They definitely don't investigate child rape, or adult rape. They just stopped even bothering to put on a public performance of "justice."

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

France is literally on fire right now, but that's because of the climate catastrophe

Washington is also ablaze

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 53 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Scrambling

Rushed

New Docs

explosive meeting

crisis threatening to engulf the Trump administration

Omg, we're about to bust this thing wide open!

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago

Neon Genesis Ifellforitagain.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Blanche, who is up for confirmation as attorney general, wrote in response to a question posed by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) that “the FBI pursued all investigative leads in its investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.” To Hirono, Blanche wrote: “Consistent with the long-standing principles of federal prosecution as outlined in the Justice Manual, several experienced prosecutors and investigators have reviewed the materials and determined that additional prosecutions are unavailable at this time.

Yes, as everyone knows, Epstein was the only collaborator and customer in his global trafficking scheme.

Well, it's becoming crystal clear why Blanche is being pushed through appointment; he's a bag man.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It was announced a few minutes ago that they may be pulling his nomination because too many Republicans wanted concessions for it.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

A bunch of Republicans want him to drop the 1.7 billion fund set up for Jan6ers and Trump fans. He's been very slippery on that front so they're refusing to vote for him. But yea Blanche is basically Trump's personal lawyer and he would turn the DoJ even more into Trump's personal law firm.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Loads fine. Maybe try disabling JavaScript

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Works fine with any adblocker.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Odd, uBlock Origin doesn't like them unless I take the time to delete layers until I get the right one.

Anyway, remove paywall is still great because fuck paying to see the news of how broke we all are and how fucked we're getting.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Unlock works fine for me with no manual adjustments.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world -3 points 17 hours ago

The Epstein files are dead. The war and gas prices did what Dear Leader wanted.

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Not for me:

Days after an explosive meeting at the White House Situation Room last July to address a crisis threatening to engulf the Trump administration, FBI Director Kash Patel sought clarity on how the scandal might implicate powerful men linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

Addressing Patel as “Boss” and citing a prior discussion between the two, an FBI official from the bureau’s Information Management Division responded by sending the director an email with a collection of spreadsheets named “Flagged Items Lists.” 

Based on guidance calling on FBI personnel tasked with redacting materials from the Epstein files to “flag items of interest for discussion with DOJ attorneys,” the FBI official informed Patel that “the list included public figures, potentially classified information, potential CSAM [child sex abuse material], etc.”

The guidance to flag these sensitive items from the Epstein files came from the Department of Justice, Assistant Director Shannon Parry informed Patel. Heading the effort for the Department of Justice was Todd Blanche, then the deputy attorney general and formerly President Donald Trump’s criminal defense lawyer. Blanche is now awaiting confirmation as attorney general from the U.S. Senate.

The email from Parry and other documents about sensitive items flagged for review by the DOJ, including references to public figures, was quietly released by the FBI last week and are being reported here for the first time.

The materials in the “Flagged Items List” had already been turned over to the Department of Justice four months earlier, Parry told Patel in the July 21, 2025 email.

“These items were produced as part of the approved Project Plan per DOJ’s guidance to flag items of interest for discussion with DOJ attorneys as we redacted."

The internal discussion at the FBI about public figures potentially implicated in the scandal was starkly different from an awkward public memo jointly released with the DOJ exactly two weeks earlier that cited “an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein” and the federal agencies’ “commitment to transparency.”

The materials, the agencies said, “did not expose any additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing” and “did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”

A DOJ spokesperson told Raw Story that “any guidance on how or what to flag was given for the purpose of general awareness in preparation for disclosure.”

The spokesperson’s statement is jarringly at odds with the July 7, 2025 memo that was a product of the document review. The memo specifically stated that it was the “determination” of the DOJ and FBI “that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.”

The DOJ did not respond to a request for clarification on the statement.

Email from FBI Information Management Division Assistant Director Shannon Parry to Director Kash Patel, July 21, 2025Courtesy FBI

Two weeks after the release of the DOJ and FBI memo attempting to put concerns about Epstein to rest, Parry was forwarding Patel materials specifically flagged so top administration officials could scrutinize possible links between powerful men and the notorious sex trafficker’s most heinous crimes.

The email included a list of six criminal cases linked to Epstein, among them an FBI investigation launched by the Miami Field Office in 2006. That case file includes a video file capturing a 2009 FBI sting operation resulting in the arrest of Alfredo Rodriguez, the former house manager for Epstein’s home in Palm Beach, Florida, on suspicion of selling a so-called “black book” containing phone numbers of young women and girls that Epstein abused.

A description of the video capturing the conversation between Rodriguez and an FBI undercover employee that was flagged for the DOJ’s review contains just the sort of details about potential involvement by Epstein associates that Trump’s supporters had avidly sought.

“The two talked about the girls (victims), others employed by Epstein and Epstein’s associates,” the description reads. “The two discussed things that happened between the girls (victims) and Epstein’s associates. There are associates named during the conversation.”

Aside from Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s partner who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2021, the description does not name any of the associates cited by Rodriguez. But when the video was released along with millions of other records through the Epstein Files Transparency Act in January 2026, the associates mentioned by Rodriguez were revealed to be former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and attorney Alan Dershowitz, among others.

“Here, Mr. Epstein says, ‘Mr. Barak, I’ll fly you to New York.’ And some of the girls that came along the way,” Rodriguez says in the video, which Raw Story reviewed. “You can bring this guy down like in no time.”

Barak told the Wall Street Journal in 2023 that he met with Epstein at his various mansions, but “never participated in any party or any other ‘inappropriate’ event with him” and “never met with girls or minors, not even with adult women in the context of any inappropriate behavior.”

Rodriguez told the FBI undercover employee that Dershowitz would typically sit at the pool with a glass of wine. Although there was “hanky-panky” upstairs, Rodriguez said he never saw any indication that he took part, although there were sometimes naked or topless girls around the pool.

Rodriguez was convicted of obstruction of justice in 2012 for hiding the “black book” and attempting to sell it. He died from cancer in 2014, after serving his sentence.

“Rodriguez’s testimony has been completely discredited,” Dershowitz told Raw Story. “He was a criminal. I never saw any females at the pool — naked, topless or otherwise. Complete fabrication.”

Dershowitz was also flagged by the FBI as a public figure linked to Epstein around the time of the controversial memo and the meeting of top officials at the Situation Room to strategize about how to insulate Trump from the furor surrounding the administration’s handling of the Epstein files.

Leslie Backshies, a special agent in charge at the New York Field Office sent an email to FBI colleagues on July 10 alerting them that Dershowitz was “referenced in the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking investigation” in two FBI witness interviews. Minutes later, Charles Yarbrough, assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigation Division, forwarded the email to Patel.

“Dershowitz was not considered a subject in this investigation and no evidence was uncovered during the investigation to suggest Dershowitz was involved in the abuse of minors,” Backshies wrote. She went on to summarize the two witness interviews.

In one, a former employee of Epstein’s said Dershowitz received a massage from an unnamed person, but that the massage was considered “to be more professional and different than the massages the girls provided.”

Another witness told the FBI that they met Dershowitz at Epstein’s home when he was alone without his wife and he received a massage — in contradiction to a public statement previously made by Dershowitz.

“Both proffers are provably false,” Dershowitz told Raw Story. “I never had sexual contact with anyone other than my wife since the day I met Jeffrey Epstein. I never did anything improper with regard to Epstein. I have been the victim of disprovably false accusations. I asked the FBI to investigate the false allegations against me.”

The FBI did not respond to a detailed set of questions for this story.

Blanche, who is up for confirmation as attorney general, wrote in response to a question posed by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) that “the FBI pursued all investigative leads in its investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.” To Hirono, Blanche wrote: “Consistent with the long-standing principles of federal prosecution as outlined in the Justice Manual, several experienced prosecutors and investigators have reviewed the materials and determined that additional prosecutions are unavailable at this time.

In response to questions from senators, Blanche refused to comment on whether the Department of Justice has initiated any new investigations related to Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring since the beginning of the second Trump administration.

The documents were released by the FBI in in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the nonprofit Democracy Forward Foundation.

"Despite the Trump-Vance administration's attempts to forestall transparency into its handling of the Epstein files with delay tactics, Democracy Forward will keep fighting in court to ensure the public has access to more of these important documents," said Dan McGrath, special counsel for oversight at the nonprofit.

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago