this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
125 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31093 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What kind of program has this internet-brain-rotted masculinity brought us? A public-health official who neglects fatal outbreaks of preventable diseases because he seems to believe that only the strong should survive. A Department of Defense, renamed the Department of War, that launches a needless war of choice in the Middle East. A government that props up the fossil-fuel industry (manly) while deliberately suppressing green alternatives (girly), leading to a catastrophic rise in energy prices when that war doesn’t go as planned. A president who imposed tariffs to bring back “manly jobs,” but only drove up inflation instead.

It’s hard to see how any of this has made men’s lives better. But maybe making other people’s lives worse is enough.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago

Demn this is good

[–] LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Weaponized masculine insecurity

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You hit the nail on the head - great and succinct summary of the article honestly.

Just as the manosphere and its galaxy of hucksters want you to fork over your cash so you can feel better about yourself as a man, Republicans want to make you feel insecure about your masculinity so that you vote Republican. Masculinity, in this sense, is a lifestyle product: one that comes with a set of political beliefs predicated on the subjugation of women, minority groups, and anyone else who men are told are their inferiors.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with masculinity itself. Boys and young men don’t seek out the manosphere “because they inherently hate women or think they are inferior,” the feminist writer Jessica Valenti has written. Rather, they “are desperate for community and answers in a confusing time of their lives.” When people are constantly told that the only way to be a worthwhile human being is to conform to gender norms, they will naturally strive to meet those expectations, even if it means being harsh to themselves or others. But the strength of those emotions is precisely what makes them so exploitable.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would argue that there are absolutely many things wrong with the idea of "masculinity" as a normative, structuralist concept. Putting people in boxes never ends well, because people are individuals and the goal should be making the world safe for individuals. If you want to reduce masculinity to a purely descriptive concept then just use those descriptions. But the idea that there's a certain set of traits which define some ideal man is and will always be a toxic idea.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I quoted the article, these aren't my words personally, just for the record.

Republicans are using this idea of masculinity to sway men into voting for them. The article is a really interesting read and does well at treating the topic of masculinity as it relates to this movement and not as a way to push men and boys into certain traits.

[–] LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You say I perfectly summarized it, but to be honest, I haven't even read the article... I am familiar with the topic at least and just put my thought about it into a laconic comment.

Generally one should only comment on an article after actually reading it.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

It’s a good read if you want to dive in. Maybe not revolutionary or new though as evidenced by your accidental correctness haha

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

But maybe making other people’s lives worse is enough.

That is the mantra of conservatives and their party: the Republican Party.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s nothing inherently wrong with masculinity itself. Boys and young men don’t seek out the manosphere “because they inherently hate women or think they are inferior,” the feminist writer Jessica Valenti has written. Rather, they “are desperate for community and answers in a confusing time of their lives.” When people are constantly told that the only way to be a worthwhile human being is to conform to gender norms, they will naturally strive to meet those expectations, even if it means being harsh to themselves or others. But the strength of those emotions is precisely what makes them so exploitable.

Adam Stanaland, a psychology professor at the University of Richmond, told me that what’s concerning is when insecure men feel pressured to validate their manhood by harming others. Stanaland co-authored a study on “fragile” masculinity that notes that such men may compensate by endorsing “political bigotry, homophobia, sexual violence, and anti-environmentalism,” and that they are “more likely to endorse policies and politicians that disproportionately harm marginalized groups.”

Stanaland speculated that for “white men especially, their masculinity is framed by this idea they must be at the top of not only the gender hierarchy, but also other social hierarchies, and so any kinds of threats to that positioning of them at the hierarchy could be responded to with these compensatory behaviors.” Sexist ideology nevertheless has a broader appeal. The former congressman Matt Gaetz, whose nomination for attorney general was derailed by allegations that he’d had sex with a minor (allegations that he denied), predicted before the 2024 election that “for every Karen we lose, there’s a Julio and a Jamal ready to sign up for the MAGA movement.”

Over the past 10 years, the misogyny of the manosphere has become more open and strident, but the big innovation seems to have been combining that conspiratorial misogyny with earnest self-help advice. Heartbreak and rejection leave people emotionally vulnerable, and the manosphere pitch often comes paired with benign advice about standing up for yourself, being mentally tough, or becoming physically active. But getting yourself together with the expectation that soon everyone you meet will be forced to respect you inevitably leads to disappointment.

When that disappointment sets in, the manosphere has an explanation: Can’t find a girlfriend? It’s because women who make their own living can no longer be forced into marrying guys they don’t like. Can’t find a job? It’s because undeserving women and minorities are being picked instead of you, even though you’re better. Feel bad about yourself? It’s because our feminized society deprived you of a life of meaningful toil, military adventure, and elevated social status. It is a bleak view of the world, a kind of male doomerism in which a meaningful life can be found only in the domination and exploitation of others.

Conservatives are getting really good at turning men against everyone else. This Texas race and how they're targeting Talarico lays it bare. Reminds me of when Steve Bannon talked openly about using the outrage from GamerGate to help funnel those men into alt-right spaces.

Great read, thank you for sharing!

[–] dumples@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

Gamergate was one of the worse events in the last decade or so. It was the start where the worse parts of the Internet started leaking into the real world. Awful time

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, here is my example of masculinity: my old man. A short scrawny little Asian scientist that got up early to go to work, came back late in the afternoon and still found time to play with his kids no matter how tired he was. He was never anything but loving to his family, 100% treated my mom as an equal partner, brought over my grandparents to Canada and then supported the entire family.

Yes he had his flaws and he admitted to them and worked to become better.

He was never loud or obnoxious, but knew his job and wherever he ended up he just did whatever had to be done to get on with whatever job was in front of him, be it reinsulating the house or interpreting data from a complex nuclear experiment. And if was truly stumped, he either found out the answer himself or asked someone that knew the answer.

He never competed with his sons (my brother and I) in an unhealthy way and made sure to teach us both academically and morally. And he wasn't afraid to show his emotions. When I finally left home, I left a letter saying how thankful I was to my parents and that I hoped I would make them proud of me. My old man cried upon reading it.

To me, that's masculinity.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My husband's father is very much like this too. The best parenting advice I have ever got was from him: "sometimes you just have to love them (your kids) through it (the hard thing)".

My husband, repects, trusts, and loves his father. He's always there, he never points blame, but is just all around emotionally available, and supportive to all his children, teaching them what he can, and always with an open heart/mind. It's really beautiful to see, as a person who has never expierenced what a good dad is myself. And now, My husband has been helping me raise my son, not even his, since he was 6, with the same dedication and emotional support. This is the "gift that keeps giving" I want for my son (the joke being the gift that keeps giving is generational trauma). The gift of having generations of not perfect, but good, accountable, at peace with themselves, dads.

Im so glad your father was good to you. It is absolutely something to cherish.

Being "strong" and having a solid "sense of masuclinity" (which can mean so many things, I dont know what words to use here), are covered under emotional regulation. Emotional regulation, is dependable, and dependable is just a good trait for anyone to have. In the past, something a "man is", one could say the word, dependable. "I can depend on my father (for support)" is, so freaking huge imo.

It takes strength to overcome hard, boisterious feelings. To regulate them, and tackle a problem with logic, in place of exlposions. To take a moment to breathe, lower your blood pressure before opening your mouth, and give space for your feelings and undersranding them as such. It is easy to explode with emotions, and act "big and tough" like a cock with his feathers puffed up for battle; it is not easy always, to stay calm, and approach things with EQ.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the fuck even is "masculinity" at this point?

[–] forgetfulmeat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They basically think it's being oppressive.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you have to follow some set of rules to be a man, you ain't no man.

Especially if the rules are being given by someone who proclaims to be an 'alpha'.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The problem with masculinity is that its identity is tied up with competence and pride. Part of “being masculine” is discerning threats to your status and ego, and using physical imposition and verbal bravado to defend them when necessary.

Discerning threats to your status and your ego reliably… in a way that most people agree with, is very very difficult for young boys who haven’t done a lot of that.

Young boys will discern threats over-zealously thinking everyone’s out to get them, and defend their ego/status over-enthusiastically thinking everyone will be impressed and/or scared.

Every joke becomes a threat in the mind of a teenager with a brain flooded by testosterone for the first time ever, at 2 - 3x higher levels than men done with puberty.

Additionally we now have myriads of douchebags on screen sitting in front of mics (metaphorically) jerking young men off for behaving like insecure inexperienced children, telling them tantrums and law breaking violence are “how men operate”.

Boys need to learn how to understand their emotions and how their actions make them look to others, and then they usually grow up to be great men if they can learn those things well.

They need to learn that fear and envy are toxic clouds, not yard sticks.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Young boys will discern threats over-zealously thinking everyone’s out to get them

My son has severe emotional regulation struggles all his life. He's been in therapy since he was 7. I found it really interesting one day, when he was 8 or 9, I seemingly out of the blue, asked him, "do you feel like people are out to get you?" He said, yes, very sternly.

The answer honestly surprised me. I saw the question on some form I did for myself (in therapy) and I thought to ask him, not really sure why. But I am glad I did. Ive been working with him on this since. A big part of what I am trying to give him is a healthy sense of self so he doesnt feel this way.

Boys need to learn how to understand their emotions and how their actions make them look to others,

This is the other big chunk of it. I noticed nearly all of the "grown men" in my terrible bloodline, did not possess this skill. Again, with help of a whole ass therapy team, I am trying to give my (fully nerodiverent) son these skills. To identify how we are feeling using words, specifics with broad vocab, just doesnt come to everyone easily, and half the battle it seems, is to beable to recognize our emotions for what they are. Then you have a chance for positive change and regulation through the tough emotions.

Another big chunk, is.. seriously, fathers need to love thier kids and be present, and set a good example for thier sons. A father not doing this, for anykid, fucks em up, but especially our sons. They need positive "masculine" role models if they stand a fighting chance to not become so vexxed they ruin thier relationships with others (and honestly themselves too), from what Ive seen in life.

and goes without saying, kids need humans to raise them, not an aglorythm.