this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
558 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30762 readers
2905 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump is openly hinting at taking over the midterm elections by declaring a national emergency.

Newsmax’s Wayne Allen Root interviewed Trump just after midnight Tuesday morning, and said that Trump had the right to declare a national security emergency next month, forcing through photo identification, proof of citizenship, limits on mail-in ballots, and other heavy voting restrictions. Trump seemed to like that suggestion, but didn’t want to tip his hand.

“Let me just say stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that,” Trump said.

Trump is afraid of massive Republican losses in November’s midterms, and has been unsuccessfully pushing his allies in Congress to pass the draconian SAVE Act. With that appearing more unlikely each day, Democrats and other Trump critics are raising concerns that he may take drastic action, such as declaring a national emergency and maybe deploying legions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to the polls.

In fact, Democrats have been trying for close to a year to get documents from the Department of Homeland Security regarding its policies and memos on sending ICE agents to polls. Agents were seen at polling places in Texas during its May primaries and in California in June, but when Democrats used the Freedom of Information Act to investigate, they were sent useless press clippings.

If Trump tries to invoke national security to take over federal elections, it would shatter precedent and could set off lawsuits and protests across the country. His repeated, disproven claims about voter fraud and rigged elections suggest that he’ll make the same excuses in November. The question is how to ensure a fair and accurate result that can stand up to his attacks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

This isn't shocking and has been floated around the real question how will people respond to it. It doesn't help they gave him that semi king status where anything as a Presidential act is fine to do.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

As a former National Guard officer I am concerned that the Guard will be turned on us and most of the Guardsman will not push back. I live in the South and I know most of the state governors will do nothing. I hope the blue state governors do something. I hope the Guardsman remember their oath. I am not hopeful. Prepare for the worst.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I hope the blue state governors do something.

glancing from Tim Walz to Gavin Newsom to Josh Shapiro

I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This was the plan since day 1. Don’t act surprised now or when there are armed men at polling stations on Election Day.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Would it be common sense to organise against this? Would it not set a good precedent for Americans to encircle the polling stations and make their grudge known?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Why doesn't he just pull an Orbán and quit? He's rich and nobody's going to sue him. Why live like this when you don't have to?

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

He's still winning.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

Because he is legally protected by the office of the president. Once he leaves, he will be prosecuted, and will go to prison for the rest of his life, for multiple offenses.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

he will be prosecuted, and will go to prison for the rest of his life

If it actually came to that (and I don't see why it would) he would flee to Russia or Saudi Arabia before spending a day in prison.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

he would flee to Russia or Saudi Arabia

You misspelled Florida

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I have come to understand narcissim is classified underpersonality disorder because of the sheer lack of self-preservation they have.

At the end of the day, it's about tearing down and going into the grave screaming for them, along with taking as many as possible.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I'd consider Orbán to be a narcissist too, though. Although not quite as far removed from the real world as Trump, of course.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago

He can try, states are going to vote though.

America held elections during the literal civil war, we can hold elections while an orange vapor balloon tried to fat on them.

We just need everyone to see what’s going on and overcome fear. Once people hear about this nonsense I expect any remaining people that aren’t awake yet but can be reached will wake up and they won’t tolerate it.

[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think he'll take action much closer to the actual election. When it's too soon for the courts to say anything about it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago

He's desperate and scared. He can't dig himself out of his shithole. He has nothing to lose by nullifying the midterms. The only hope the USA has is that he dies.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The surest way to turn a +/- 2 Talarico electorate into a 5-6 point Talarico win is to openly try and fuck with the election.

Even in Texas. Even when (some of) the Republicans are as corrupt as god makes politicians, including the candidate and their governor. Turns out, it's a lot harder to propagandize people in the middle of the bullshit you're pulling.

Incidentally, that's why some of your Republican friends and family are at their most reasonable immediate after something happens. They haven't received their lines yet, and the feelings of the story are still their primary decision drivers.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

They haven’t received their lines yet

This is exactly why trump is saying this shit openly in advance.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

This is also why I think the more immediate goal of Democrats and progressives is to attack the right wing propaganda vectors. If those collapse even if it's just say talk radio, tv, and maybe Facebook it'll destroy a lot of the transmission capabilities and people will more likely make decisions based on their actual baseline personalities.

As for how to destroy them, I say just blow out their business models. Ban their ability to advertise and collect data.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 133 points 1 day ago (17 children)

We need to all be eyeing the break glass solution: a general strike. If Trump subverts the elections, then we turn off the economy until fair elections are held.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

IIRC, in the decades leading up to the 20th century, workers and other pro-labor bamfs in the US would go on parades around town to signal their collective strength to the bourgeoisie/industrialists and intimidate them into compliance.

Bring back the bullying of capitalists, please. Also, who doesn't love a parade?

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Now get people to actually do it. I'll gladly do it but I don't think my neighbors would. not because they are on the side of evil, but because they can't afford a day without money. (At least that's what they think, the reality though might be different)

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's all good in words, but I've got maybe 3 days worth of food at my place. So come day 5 I'm fucked

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

3 weeks without food. Make sure you have a source of water first, then worry about the eating part.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That's why we're supposed to take care of each other in situations like that. My kitchen is overstocked and I'm a chef who knows how to make the most out of what's available. I share my food and you pitch in however you can.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Mutual aid! It's a wonderful thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago

The Antichrist who hates America and is raping children while stealing billions doesn’t want to be held accountable? Crazy!

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

is it time that the UN starts to talk about putting [armed?] observers on the ground to make sute that the elections are not tampered with, like they do for other 3rd world countries?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpaceTimeInterval@lemmy.cafe 67 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Time to prepare for mass protests. Completely surround the White House if he does that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

my solace with every crazy scheme is that he always fucks up everything he touches. waiting for spectacular losing. would interfere with his JD blanket pardon scheme, ala nixon. either way he'll screw himself. party of confederacy only knows failure. like to play soldier, fat fuck?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

he always fucks up everything he touches

Like he fucked up the 2016 and 2024 elections? He sure seems to have a lot of power for someone that fucks everything up.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah...Americans love to blame Trump for all the power they repeatedly give him.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I'm not convinced we gave him anything. There are Russian Tails in 2016, 2020, and 2024 all in favor of him. You can see it get more pronounced in every election with the 2024 election being the most obvious, likely because they failed to successfully cheat in 2020 thanks to all the mail-in ballots.

Including more data on the numbers here: https://electiontruthalliance.org/analysis/clark-county-nevada/ There are more states you can look at, but you'll need to go back to the main page and scroll down to the bottom for the other states.

And that's not counting all the other election interference like the bomb threats, and mail in ballots found in ditches, or the purged voter rolls. But of course they poisoned the well by projecting their own actions on to the Democratic Party, so now if you dare to say the a man known for fraud, and cheating did it fucking again, you get called blue maga or some shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He isn’t ‘mulling’ it or even considering it, it’s already set into motion. They’re going to steal the midterms. Everybody knows except for the American people it seems who will gladly except their already shithole country will become that even more

[–] datrenaissancebro@mtgzone.com 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think you'll find that many Americans see this as the last bit of faith in the system they have left. If it gets pulled out of their hands, you're going to see a very different type of American.

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 7 points 23 hours ago

I've given up on America caring

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is there any legal precedent for what happens when would-be voters are detained in front of polls by federal agents for bullshit reasons that definitely have nothing to do with their voter registration? If not, I'm sure there will be.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›